...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Evaluation of historic and operational satellite radar altimetry missions for constructing consistent long-term lake water level records
【24h】

Evaluation of historic and operational satellite radar altimetry missions for constructing consistent long-term lake water level records

机译:评估历史和运营卫星雷达Altimetry任务,用于构建一致的长期湖水级记录

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A total of 13 satellite missions have been launched since?1985, with different types of radar altimeters on board. This study intends to make a comprehensive evaluation of historic and currently operational satellite radar altimetry missions for lake water level retrieval over the same set of lakes and to develop a strategy for constructing consistent long-term water level records for inland lakes at global scale. The lake water level estimates produced by different retracking algorithms (retrackers) of the satellite missions were compared with the gauge measurements over 12 lakes in four countries. The performance of each retracker was assessed in terms of the data missing rate, the correlation coefficient? r , the bias, and the root mean square error?(RMSE) between the altimetry-derived lake water level estimates and the concurrent gauge measurements. The results show that the model-free retrackers (e.g.,?OCOG/Ice-1/Ice) outperform the model-based retrackers for most of the missions, particularly over small lakes. Among the satellite altimetry missions, Sentinel-3 gave the best results, followed by SARAL. ENVISAT has slightly better lake water level estimates than Jason-1 and Jason-2, but its data missing rate is higher. For small lakes, ERS-1 and ERS-2 missions provided more accurate lake water level estimates than the TOPEX/Poseidon mission. In contrast, for large lakes, TOPEX/Poseidon is a better option due to its lower data missing rate and shorter repeat cycle. GeoSat and GeoSat Follow-On?(GFO) both have an extremely high data missing rate of lake water level estimates. Although several contemporary radar altimetry missions provide more accurate lake level estimates than GFO, GeoSat was the sole radar altimetry mission, between?1985 and?1990, that provided the lake water level estimates. With a full consideration of the performance and the operational duration, the best strategy for constructing long-term lake water level records should be a two-step bias correction and normalization procedure. In the first step, use Jason-2 as the initial reference to estimate the systematic biases with TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, and Jason-3 and then normalize them to form a consistent TOPEX/Poseidon–Jason series. Then, use the TOPEX/Poseidon–Jason series as the reference to estimate and remove systematic biases with other radar altimetry missions to construct consistent long-term lake water level series for ungauged lakes.
机译:自1985年以来,共启动了13项卫星任务,船上的不同类型的雷达高度计。本研究旨在全面评估历史和目前运营的卫星雷达高级法官,用于在同一组湖泊中检索湖水水平检索,并制定在全球范围内为内陆湖泊构建一致的长期水位记录的策略。将卫星任务的不同回想算法(套管)产生的湖水水平估计与四个国家12湖中的规格测量进行了比较。在数据缺失率方面评估每个套法的性能,相关系数? R,偏差和根均方误差?(RMSE)在高度偏转湖水级估计和并发规格测量之间。结果表明,无模型的习惯(例如,?在卫星Altimetry任务中,Sentinel-3给出了最佳结果,然后是令人遗憾的结果。 Envisat湖泊水位略有更好,而不是Jason-1和Jason-2,但其数据缺失率较高。对于小湖泊,ERS-1和ERS-2任务提供了比Topex / Poseidon Mission更精确的湖泊水位估算。相比之下,对于大湖泊,Topex / Poseidon是一种更好的选择,因为它的数据缺失率较低,重复周期较短。 Geosat和Geosat的后续?(GFO)两者都有极高的湖水水位估计数据缺失率。虽然若干当代雷达Altimetry任务提供比GFO更准确的湖泊估计,但GeoSat是唯一的雷达Altimetry任务,在1985年和1990年之间,提供了湖水级估计。通过完全思考性能和运营持续时间,构建长期湖水级记录的最佳策略应该是两步偏置校正和归一化程序。在第一步中,使用Jason-2作为初始参考,以估计具有Topex / Poseidon,Jason-1和Jason-3的系统偏差,然后将它们标准化以形成一致的Topex / Poseidon-Jason系列。然后,使用Topex / POSEIDON-JASON系列作为估计和删除系统偏差的参考,并使用其他雷达ALTIMETRY任务构建一致的长期湖水水平系列,用于未凝固的湖泊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号