首页> 外文期刊>Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy >More ‘milk’ than ‘psychology or tablets’: Mental health professionals’ perspectives on the value of peer support workers
【24h】

More ‘milk’ than ‘psychology or tablets’: Mental health professionals’ perspectives on the value of peer support workers

机译:更多“牛奶”比“心理学或平板电脑”:精神卫生专业人员对同行支持工人的价值的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Though growing numbers of peer support workers are employed in the UK National Health Service (NHS), conflicts persist between core values of peer support and values which exert power within these services. Objectives To explore what NHS mental health professionals value about the peer support worker role. Design Five professionals from different professions and mental health settings were interviewed twice. The first interviews explored their experiences of working with peers. Transcripts were analysed using discourse analysis and psychosocial theory. Second interviews allowed participants to respond to the analysis and influence subsequent analysis. Results Mental health professionals valued peers for the deeply empathic, relational approach they brought, based in their subjective experience. Peer work was also valued for the affect‐focused quality of this work, and the challenge peers pose to existing values in mental health services. The values of peer support troubled dominant ways of working based in forms of knowledge that favour objectivity and hence encountered challenges. Conclusions Peers fulfil the role of amplifying the status of diverse forms of knowledge, values and related ways of working that have become marginalized in NHS mental health services. It is important that peers are not seen as an isolated solution to the marginalization of these forms of knowledge and values, but that their way of working becomes reflected in other roles whilst evoking change throughout these services. Patient or Public Contribution Patient and Public Involvement groups were consulted both in the design and analysis stages of the study.
机译:背景技术虽然在英国国家卫生服务(NHS)中雇用的同行支持工人数量越来越多,但在同行支持的核心价值观与施加在这些服务中的权力之间的核心价值之间存在冲突。探讨NHS精神卫生专业人员对同行支持工作人员角色的价值的目标。设计了来自不同职业和心理健康环境的五个专业人员进行了面试两次。第一次访谈探讨了他们与同行合作的经历。使用话语分析和心理社会理论分析转录物。第二次访谈使参与者响应分析和影响后续分析。结果心理健康专业人员有价值的同行,他们为他们带来了深刻的移情,关键方法,他们带来了他们的主观经验。同行工作也受到了对此作品的影响质量的重视,并挑战同龄人对心理健康服务的现有价值观。基于知识形式的人们支持客观性,因此遇到挑战,对同伴支持的陷入困境的主要方式。结论同行符合放大各种形式的知识,价值观和相关方式的地位,这些工作的作用在NHS心理健康服务中被边缘化。重要的是,同行并不被视为孤立的解决方案,以对这些形式的知识和价值观的边缘化,但它们的工作方式变得反映在其他角色,而在整个这些服务中唤起变化。在研究的设计和分析阶段,咨询患者或公共贡献患者和公共参与群体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号