Artificial resuscitation has potential to reverse a premature death or to prolong the dying process. The resuscitation decision is one of life and death making it imperative that healthcare providers understand patients’ beliefs. Making the decision to resuscitate has been associated with patients’ spiritual/religious beliefs. Clinicians’ assumptions based upon a patients’ religion or spiritual beliefs may bias the resuscitation decision. The purpose of this study was to determine associations between hospitalized patients’ spiritual/religious beliefs and their resuscitation decisions. A single-site, correlational study was conducted with a convenience sample of hospitalized patients in Honolulu, HI. Patients were enrolled November 2015 to January 2016. Spiritual/religious beliefs were assessed using two validated metrics. Two questions were used to determine the resuscitation decision (chest compressions and intubation). The sample of 84 patients represented no ethnic majority among Caucasian, Asian, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Seventy-nine percent of the participants identified theistic spiritual beliefs. No associations were found between resuscitation decisions with either spiritual/religious beliefs or demographic characteristics of this study sample. Interestingly, 20% of the participants answered yes to only one of the resuscitation decision questions. Thus, providers’ assumptions should not be made about an association between spiritual/religious beliefs and resuscitation decisions. It is imperative that patients are aware of the necessity for both medical interventions of chest compressions and intubation. Further research should address the complexity of the resuscitation decision, including patients understanding of medical interventions and anticipated prognosis, and other influencing factors.
展开▼
