...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Graduate Medical Education >Applying Smarter: A Critique of the AAMC Apply Smart Tools
【24h】

Applying Smarter: A Critique of the AAMC Apply Smart Tools

机译:申请更智能:AAMC的批评应用智能工具

获取原文
           

摘要

Close inspection of the Apply Smart graphics reveals several surprising features. For instance, the probability of successfully entering a residency program for applicants who apply to fewer than 5 to 10 programs is strikingly low—sometimes just 20% to 40%. Given the high cost of not securing a residency position, it is curious that so many candidates would “underapply,” especially since the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) charges a flat rate for the first 10 applications within a specialty.~(7) What type of student would apply to less than 10 programs and accept such a low probability of success? The likely answer is one who is not especially interested in matching to that specialty in the first place.Therefore, a second strategy would be to leverage ERAS data to provide applicants with more informative statistics. The AAMC could do this by focusing not on the number of applications submitted, but on the probability that a given application will result in an interview offer.
机译:密切检查应用智能图形显示出几种令人惊讶的功能。例如,成功进入申请申请人的居留计划的概率对于申请少于5到10节方案的申请人被引人注目,有时仅为20%至40%。鉴于未确保居住地位的高成本,很好,这很多候选人会“欠宽容”,特别是因为电子居住申请服务(ERAS)为特种内部的前10个应用指控的统一率。〜(7)什么类型的学生将申请少于10个计划并接受如此低的成功概率?可能的答案是一个对第一个不对这个专业匹配的人。因此,第二次策略是利用时代数据提供更有信息统计的申请人。 AAMC可以通过重点关注提交的申请数量来实现这一目标,而是在给定申请将导致面试要约的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号