...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions >Review article: A systematic review and future prospects of flood vulnerability indices
【24h】

Review article: A systematic review and future prospects of flood vulnerability indices

机译:审查文章:洪水漏洞指标的系统审查和未来展望

获取原文
           

摘要

Despite the increasing body of research on flood vulnerability, a review of the methods used in the construction of vulnerability indices is still missing. Here, we address this gap by providing a state-of-art account on flood vulnerability indices, highlighting worldwide trends and future research directions. A total of 95 peer-reviewed articles published between 2002–2019 were systematically analyzed. An exponential rise in research effort is demonstrated, with 80?% of the articles being published since 2015. The majority of these studies (62.1?%) focused on the neighborhood followed by the city scale (14.7?%). Min–max normalization (30.5?%), equal weighting (24.2?%), and linear aggregation (80.0?%) were the most common methods. With regard to the indicators used, a focus was given to socioeconomic aspects (e.g., population density, illiteracy rate, and gender), whilst components associated with the citizen's coping and adaptive capacity were slightly covered. Gaps in current research include a lack of sensitivity and uncertainty analyses (present in only 9.5?% and 3.2?% of papers, respectively), inadequate or inexistent validation of the results (present in 13.7?% of the studies), lack of transparency regarding the rationale for weighting and indicator selection, and use of static approaches, disregarding temporal dynamics. We discuss the challenges associated with these findings for the assessment of flood vulnerability and provide a research agenda for attending to these gaps. Overall, we argue that future research should be more theoretically grounded while, at the same time, considering validation and the dynamic aspects of vulnerability.
机译:尽管对洪水脆弱性的研究越来越多,但仍缺少对漏洞指数建设中使用的方法的审查。在这里,我们通过为洪水漏洞指数提供最先进的账户来解决这一差距,突出全球趋势和未来的研究方向。系统地分析了2002 - 2019年之间发表的95条同行评审文章。证明了研究努力的指数上升,自2015年以来出版的80份文章。这些研究的大多数研究(62.1?%)专注于邻里,然后是城市规模(14.7?%)。最大归一化(30.5?%),相等的加权(24.2?%),线性聚集(80.0?%)是最常见的方法。关于所用指标,对社会经济方面的重点(例如,人口密度,文盲率和性别),虽然与市民的应对和适应能力相关的组件略微覆盖。目前研究中的差距包括缺乏敏感性和不确定性分析(分别以9.5?%和3.2?%,分别存在于3.2份),结果不足或不良验证(在13.7%的研究中存在),缺乏透明度关于加权和指示器选择的理由,以及使用静态方法,无视时间动态。我们讨论了与这些调查结果相关的挑战,以评估洪水脆弱性,并为参加这些差距提供研究议程。总体而言,我们认为未来的研究应该更为理论上,同时考虑验证和脆弱性的动态方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号