首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Pediatrics >Assessment of Inadequate Use of Pediatric Emergency Medical Transport Services: The Pediatric Emergency and Ambulance Critical Evaluation (PEACE) Study
【24h】

Assessment of Inadequate Use of Pediatric Emergency Medical Transport Services: The Pediatric Emergency and Ambulance Critical Evaluation (PEACE) Study

机译:评估儿科紧急医疗运输服务不足:儿科紧急和救护车批评评估(和平)研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To provide data on the inadequate use of emergency medical transports services (EMTS) in children and underlying contributing factors. Methods: This was a prospective single-center cohort study (01/2017-12/2017) performed at the Saarland University Children's Hospital, Homburg, Germany. Patients ≤20 years of age transported by EMTS for suspected acute illness/trauma were included and proportion of inadequate/adequate EMTS use, underlying contributing factors, and additional costs were analyzed. Results: Three hundred seventy-nine patients (mean age: 9.0 ± 6.3 years; 55.7% male, 44.3% female) were included in this study. The three most common reasons for EMTS use were: central nervous system (30.6%), respiratory system affection (14.0%), and traumas (13.2%). ETMS use was categorized as inadequate depending on physician's experience: senior physician (58.8%), pediatrician (54.9%), resident (52.7%). All three physicians considered 127 (33.5%) cases to be medically indicated for transportation by EMTS, and 177 (46.7%) to be medically not indicated. The following parameters were significantly associated with inadequate EMTS use: non-acute onset of symptoms (OR 2.5), parental perception as non-life-threatening (OR 1.7), and subsequent out-patient treatment (OR 4.0). Conversely, transport by an emergency physician (OR 3.5) and first time parental EMTS call (OR 1.7) were associated with adequate use of EMTS. Moreover, a significant relation existed between maternal, respectively, paternal educational status and inadequate EMTS use (each p = 0.01). Using multiple logistic regression analysis, non-acute onset of symptoms (OR 2.2) was associated with inadequate use of EMTS while first time parental EMTS call (OR 1.8), transport by an emergency physician (OR 3.3), and need for in-patient treatment (OR 4.0) were associated with adequate use of EMTS. Conclusion: A substantial number of pediatric EMTS is medically not indicated. Possibly, specific measures including multifaceted educational efforts may be helpful in reducing unnecessary EMTS use.
机译:目的:提供关于儿童和潜在贡献因素的紧急医疗运输服务(EMTS)不充分使用的数据。方法:这是一项潜在的单中心队列研究(01/2017-12/2017)在德国苏门兰,萨尔兰大学儿童医院进行。因疑似急性疾病/创伤的EMTS运输患者≤20岁,并分析了/充足/充分的emts使用,潜在的贡献因素和额外费用的比例。结果:三百七十九患者(平均年龄:9.0±6.3岁; 55.7%的男性,44.3%的女性)被纳入本研究。 EMTS使用的三种最常见的原因是:中枢神经系统(30.6%),呼吸系统情感(14.0%)和创伤(13.2%)。根据医生的经验,ETMS使用被分类为不足:高级医师(58.8%),儿科医生(54.9%),居民(52.7%)。所有三个医师认为127(33.5%)案件,用于通过EMTS运输,177名(46.7%)未指出。以下参数显着与EMTS使用不足:症状(或2.5)的非急性发作,父母感知为非危及危及生命(或1.7),以及随后的外患者治疗(或4.0)。相反,通过紧急医生(或3.5)和第一次父母EMTS呼叫(或1.7)的运输与EMTS充分利用相关。此外,母体之间存在显着关系,父母的教育状态和emts使用不足(每个P = 0.01)。使用多元逻辑回归分析,症状(或2.2)的非急性发作与EMTS使用不足,而父母呼叫(或1.8),应急医生(或3.3)运输,需要患者治疗(或4.0)与充分使用EMTS相关。结论:大量的儿科eMTS在医学上没有表明。可能的是,包括多方面教育工作的具体措施可能有助于减少不必要的救护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号