首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Surgery >Follow Up Data of MRI-Visible Synthetic Meshes for Reinforcement in Large Hiatal Hernia in Comparison to None-Mesh Repair—A Prospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Follow Up Data of MRI-Visible Synthetic Meshes for Reinforcement in Large Hiatal Hernia in Comparison to None-Mesh Repair—A Prospective Cohort Study

机译:与None-Mesh修复相比,MRI可见合成网的MRI可见合成网格中的数据进行加固,以至于无网格修复 - 预期队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Mesh augmentation for large hiatal hernia is still controversial because of high alleged risk of chronic reaction or shrinkage of mesh orifice surrounding the esophagus. The aim of this cohort study was to develop and establish an image analysis scheme, including 3D reconstruction, for MRI-visible meshes (DynaMesh?) to measure postoperative mesh shrinkage in order to observe potential complications. Methods: Between 12/2012 and 10/2016, n = 33 patients underwent surgery to correct symptomatic hiatal hernia (implantation indicated: n = 18). Intraoperative measurement of the hiatal surface area (HSA) 5 cm 2 was indication for mesh implantation. Early postoperatively, and during long-term follow-up, MRI was performed and patients filled out the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI score). Results: Follow-up rate was 76% ( n = 25/33). Overall recurrence rate was 4% (1/25). No other patient showed reflux or dysphagia symptoms. Mesh related complications were not observed during follow-up period. Median GIQLI score of patients with mesh was 123 (range: 67–144), and 93 (52–141) for patients without mesh. Comparison of early and mid-term postoperative MRI for patients with mesh showed changes in mesh orifice size of 3% (corresponding to a slight increase in size of about 6 mm 2 ) without any significant correlations with BMI, HSA, or patient age. Conclusion: We established an image analysis and 3D reconstruction scheme for MRI visible meshes in hiatal hernia repair. MRI images of normal clinical quality are sufficient for this analysis. Mesh orifice size in MRI-visible meshes does not seem to change at a clinically relevant level in the small cohort observed here. Further studies of large cohorts are necessary to establish if HSA 5 cm 2 could be a suitable measure for indication of mesh implantation.
机译:背景:大型疝气的网格增强仍然是争议的,因为涉嫌慢性反应或食管围绕食道孔孔的收缩的风险。该队列研究的目的是开发和建立一种图像分析方案,包括3D重建,用于MRI可见网格(动态?)以测量术后网格收缩以观察潜在的并发症。方法:12/2012和10/2016之间,N = 33名患者接受手术治疗纠正症状性疝疝(指出的植入:N = 18)。内腔表面积(HSA)&GT的术中测量。 5厘米2是网眼植入的指示。术后早期,在长期随访期间,进行MRI,患者填补了生命指数的胃肠道质量(Giqli得分)。结果:随访率为76%(n = 25/33)。总体复发率为4%(1/25)。没有其他患者显示回流或吞咽症状。在随访期间未观察到网格相关的并发症。 Mesh患者的中位数Giqli评分为123(范围:67-144),93(52-141),用于没有网格。对网眼患者的早期和中期术后MRI的比较显示出网眼孔尺寸的变化为3%(对应于约6mm 2的略微增加),而不与BMI,HSA或患者年龄的任何显着相关性。结论:建立了疝气疝修复中MRI可见网格的图像分析和三维重构方案。正常临床质量的MRI图像足以这种分析。 MEBES孔口尺寸在MRI可见网格中似乎在这里观察到的小群组中的临床相关水平似乎没有变化。对大群组的进一步研究是建立HSA&gt的必要条件。5cm 2可以是适当的措施,用于指示网状植入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号