首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Rapid Point-Of-Care Serology and Clinical History Assessment Increase Protection Provided by RT-PCR Screening: A Pilot Study Involving Three Nursing Homes in Brescia, a Hotspot of Lombardy
【24h】

Rapid Point-Of-Care Serology and Clinical History Assessment Increase Protection Provided by RT-PCR Screening: A Pilot Study Involving Three Nursing Homes in Brescia, a Hotspot of Lombardy

机译:RT-PCR筛查提供的快速护理血清学和临床历史评估增加保护:一项试验研究,涉及伦巴第一个热点的热点三个疗养院

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: COVID-19 outbursts have been registered worldwide within care homes with asymptomatic transmission combined with shortage/inaccuracy of diagnostic tests undermining the efforts at containment of the disease. Nursing facilities in Lombardy (Italy) were left with no, or limited, access to testing for 8 weeks after the outbreak of COVID-19. Methods: This study includes 246 residents and 286 workers of three different nursing homes in Brescia-Lombardy. Clinical questionnaires and rapid serology tests were devised to integrate the data of the first available RT-PCR screening. Follow-up serology after 60-days was performed on 67 of 86 workers with positive serology or clinically suspicious. Findings: Thirty-seven residents and 18 workers had previous positive RT-PCR. Thorough screening disclosed two additional RT-PCR-positive workers. Serology screening revealed antibodies in 59 residents and 48 workers, including 32/37 residents and all workers previously positive at RT-PCR. Follow up serology disclosed antibodies in two additional workers with recent symptoms at the time of screening. The professionals in close contact with residents had more infections (47/226–20.79% vs. 1/60–1.66%; p = 0.00013 Fisher exact-test). A suspicious clinical score was present in 44/64 residents and in 41/50 workers who tested positive with either method with totally asymptomatic disease more frequent among residents 28.1 vs. 10.0% ( p = 0.019 Fisher exact-test). Interpretation: Based on the available RT-PCR ± results at the time of symptoms/contacts, our integrated clinical and serological screening demonstrated sensitivity 89% and specificity 87%. This multimodal assessment proved extremely useful in understanding the viral spread in nursing homes, in defining its stage and in implementing protective measures. Rapid serology tests demonstrated efficient and particularly suited for older people less able to move/cooperate.
机译:背景:Covid-19爆发已经在全球范围内注册了在护理家庭中,无症状传输结合缺乏诊断测试的短缺/不准确性,破坏了抑制疾病的努力。在Covid-19爆发后8周后,伦巴第伦巴第(意大利)的护理设施留下了没有,无限期地获得测试8周。方法:本研究包括246名居民和布雷西亚 - 伦巴第三种不同护理家庭的286名工人。设计临床问卷和快速血清学测试,以集成第一个可用RT-PCR筛选的数据。 60天后的后续血清学,在86名工人的67名,患有阳性血清学或临床上可疑。调查结果:三十七名居民和18名工人均有阳性RT-PCR。彻底筛选公开了两种额外的RT-PCR阳性工人。血清学筛选揭示了59名居民和48名工人的抗体,其中包括32/37名居民,所有在RT-PCR阳性的工人。随后在筛选时近期患者的血液学公开了抗体。与居民密切接触的专业人士有更多的感染(47 / 226-20.79%,5 / 60-1.66%; P = 0.00013 Fisher精确测试)。 44/64名居民和41/50名工人中存在可疑的临床分数,他们用完全无症状疾病的方法测试阳性,在居民28.1节中的居民28.1节中更频繁(P = 0.019 Fisher精确试验)。解释:基于症状/触点时的可用RT-PCR±结果,我们的综合临床和血清学筛查显示敏感性89%和特异性87%。这种多模式评估证明,在理解护理家庭中的病毒蔓延方面非常有用,在定义其阶段和实施保护措施方面。快速血清学测试证明了高效,特别适用于更少能够移动/合作的老年人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号