...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
【24h】

Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

机译:十二指肠溃疡患者的新型PPI,一种新的PPI,雷比拉唑的粘膜治疗效果和安全性:随机双盲多中心期II临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated. Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is ?2.9% (95% CI, ?16.5–10.7%), and ?0.5% (95% CI, ?13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is ?1.8% (95% CI, ?19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, ?12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group. Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term= {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT04503629","term_id":"NCT04503629"}} NCT04503629 &cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT04503629","term_id":"NCT04503629"}} NCT04503629 .
机译:背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是验证胃酸抑制剂,并已广泛用于治疗活性十二指肠溃疡的患者。虽然现有的PPI表现出了很大的效力,但许多科学家们仍然致力于开发更有效的PPI,具有更好的安全性。在此,我们旨在比较阿扎拉唑在十二指肠粘膜愈合,一种新的PPI中的安全性和疗效与拉巴唑唑唑。方法:在该多中心,随机,阳性控制,双盲,并联群II临床试验中,共有150名具有内窥镜证实活性十二指肠溃疡的合格患者被随机(1:1:1)接受Rabeprazole 10 mg ,壬唑20mg或壬唑40mg 4周。通过独立的中央审查和调查员审查,比较了4周治疗后溃疡愈合率。此外,评估症状和安全性。结果:基于独立的中央评论,10mg rabepazole,20mg壬唑和40mg壬唑基团的溃疡愈合率分别为88.0,85.1和87.5%,在FAS群体中分别为88.9,86.0和90.9%分别在PPS人口中。阿巴扎拉20mg和rabeprazole 10mg之间的溃疡愈合率差异是β2.9%(95%CI,α16.5-10.7%),α10.5%(95%CI,α13.5-12.5%)αaprazole40 mg和rabeprazole之间10毫克,在FAS人口中。基于调查员评审,分别在FAS群体和75.6,72.1和79.5%中分别为72.0,70.2和40毫克Anaprazole组的溃疡愈合率为72.0,70.2和77.1% ,在PPS人口中。 α10mg和rabeprazole之间的溃疡愈合速率差异为10mg是α1.8%(95%Ci,19.8-16.3%)和5.1%(95%CI,α2-22.3%),anaprazole 40mg和rabeprazole 10之间MG,在FAS人口中。大多数患者(& 90%)最终取得了完全症状浮雕。不良事件的发病率在治疗组之间没有显着差异。在两种阿巴布拉唑剂量组中观察到比雷比拉唑10mg组在两种阿巴布拉唑剂量组中观察到潜在的潜在的肝脏耐受性。结论:每天20和40毫克的剂量,Anaprazole在治疗本第2期的活性十字溃疡的情况下是有效的,这使得阿巴布拉可以进入III期临床试验。临床试验注册:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term= {“type”:“临床 - 试验”,“attrs”:{“text”:“nct04503629”,“term_id”: “nct04503629”}} nct04503629&cntry =&state =&city =&dist =,标识符:ctr20181464,{“type”:“临床试验”,“attrs”:{“text”:“nct04503629”,“term_id”:“nct04503629” nct04503629。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号