首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Translational Research >Microsurgical clipping vs. arterial embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms
【24h】

Microsurgical clipping vs. arterial embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms

机译:发生破裂前循环动脉瘤治疗中的显微外科剪裁与动脉栓塞

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms with that of arterial embolization in the treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Methods: The clinical data of 68 patients treated in our hospital for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms between January 2017 and March 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups: the microsurgical clipping group (30 cases) and the arterial embolization group (38 cases). The following markers were compared between the two groups: Hunt-Hess classification (HHC) grading, aneurysm occlusion rate, and incidence of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, and the scores of the Glasgow Outcome Scale, Modified Rankin Scale, and Barthel Index during the 6-months follow-up after hospital discharge. Results: The cases of HHC grade I and II increased in both groups at hospital discharge (both P0.05). The complete occlusion rate in the microsurgical clipping group was higher than that in the arterial embolization group (P0.05). However, the arterial embolization group had lower incidence of intracranial infection and higher incidence of vasospasm than the microsurgical clipping group (both P0.05). During the follow-up, the arterial embolization group had better results in terms of the Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index results and had more patients with GOS score of 5 points than the microsurgical clipping group (all P0.05). Conclusion: Both microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms and arterial embolization can effectively treat ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms, and the short-term efficacy achieved by these two methods is similar. Compared with microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms, arterial embolization can lead to shorter hospitalization, lower incidence of intracranial infection, and better patients’ prognosis and quality of life after the operation. However, the microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms can achieve higher complete occlusion rate, lower incidence of vasospasm, and lower hospitalization cost than arterial embolization.
机译:目的:我们旨在比较颅内动脉瘤的显微外科剪伤与动脉栓塞治疗破裂前循环动脉瘤的疗效。方法:回顾性地分析了2017年1月至2020年3月在我院治疗的68名患者的临床资料。根据外科手术方法,患者分为两组:显微外科剪切组(30例)和动脉栓塞组(38例)。在两组:猎犬分类(HHC)分级,动脉瘤闭塞率和术后并发症发病率,住院时间长,住院费用和格拉斯哥结果规模的分数之间,修改了Rankin规模,改进了Rankin规模的分数。在医院放电后6个月随访期间,条形指数。结果:医院出院两组的HHC等级I和II案例增加(P0.05)。显微外科剪切基团中的完全闭塞率高于动脉栓塞组(P0.05)。然而,动脉栓塞组的颅内感染的发生率降低,血管痉挛发病率高(均为P <0.05)。在随访期间,动脉栓塞组在改进的Rankin规模和条形指数结果方面具有更好的结果,并且更多的患者GOS得分比显微外科剪切组(所有P <0.05)。结论:颅内动脉瘤和动脉栓塞的显微外科削减可以有效地治疗破裂的前循环动脉瘤,并且通过这两种方法实现的短期疗效是相似的。与颅内动脉瘤的显微外科剪报相比,动脉栓塞可导致住院时间短,颅内感染的发病率降低,以及在手术后更好的患者预后和生活质量。然而,颅内动脉瘤的显微外科削减可以达到更高的完全闭塞率,较低的血管痉挛发病率,以及低于动脉栓塞的住院成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号