首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Orthopaedic Translation >3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
【24h】

3D ultrasound imaging provides reliable angle measurement with validity comparable to X-ray in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

机译:3D超声成像提供可靠的角度测量,可与青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的X射线相当的有效性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background & ObjectiveThe application of ultrasound imaging for spine evaluation could minimize radiation exposure for patients with adolescence idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A customized three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging system has been demonstrated to provide reliable and valid coronal curvature measurements. However, these measurements were using the spinous processes as anatomical reference, leading to a predictable underestimation of the traditionally used Cobb angles. An alternative 3D ultrasound image reconstruction method was applied to create coronal images with more lateral features for angle measurement. The objective of this study was to test the reliability and the validity of this angle, the ultrasound curve angle (UCA), and compare the UCA with the Cobb angles on X-ray images of patients with AIS.Materials and methodsThis study was divided into: 1) Investigation of intra- and inter-reliability between two raters for measuring the UCA and two operators for acquiring ultrasound images; 2) Investigation of the validity between the radiographic Cobb angle and the UCA. Fifty patients and 164 patients with AIS, were included in the two stages, respectively. Patients underwent bi-planar X-ray and 3D ultrasound scanning on the same day. The proposed UCA was used to measure the coronal curvature from the ultrasound coronal images, which were formed using a newly customized volume projection imaging (VPI) method. The intra-rater/operator and inter-rater and operator reliability of the UCA were tested by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (3,1) and (2,1), respectively. The validity of UCA measurements as compared to radiographic Cobb angles was tested by inter-method ICC (2,1), mean absolute difference (MAD), standard error of measurement (SEM), Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland–Altman statistics. The level of significance was set as 0.05.ResultsExcellent intra-rater and intra-operator (ICC (3,1)≥0.973) and excellent inter-rater and inter-operator reliability (ICC (2,1)≥0.925) for UCA measurement, with overall MAD and SEM no more than 3.5° and 1.7° were demonstrated for both main thoracic and (thoraco)lumbar curvatures. Very good correlations were observed between UCA and Cobb angle for main thoracic (R2=0.893) and (thoraco)lumbar (R2=0.884) curves. The mean (SD) measurements in terms of radiographic Cobb and UCA were 27.2??±??11.6° and 26.3??±??11.4° for main thoracic curves; and 26.2??±??11.4° and 24.8??±??9.7° for (thoraco)lumbar curve respectively. One hundred sixty-four subjects (33 male and 131 female subjects; 11–18 years of age, mean of 15.1??±??1.9 years) were included for the validity session. Excellent inter-method variations (ICC (2,K) ≥0.933) with overall MAD and SEM no more than 3.0° and 1.5° were demonstrated for both main thoracic and (thoraco)lumbar curvatures. In addition, Bland–Altman plots demonstrated an acceptable agreement between ultrasound and radiographic Cobb measurements.ConclusionIn this study, very good correlations and agreement were demonstrated between the ultrasound and X-ray measurements of the scoliotic curvature. Judging from the promising results of this study, patients with AIS with different severity of curves can be evaluated and monitored by ultrasound imaging, reducing the usage of radiation during follow-ups. This method could also be used for scoliosis screening.The Translational potential of this article:Ultrasound curve angle (UCA) obtained from 3D ultrasound imaging system can provide reliable and valid evaluation on coronal curvature for patients with AIS, without the need of radiation.
机译:背景和放大器;超声成像的脊柱评价ObjectiveThe应用程序可以最大限度地减少患者的青少年脊柱侧凸(AIS)的辐射。定制的三维(3D)超声成像系统已被证明提供可靠和有效的冠状曲率测量。然而,这些测量使用棘突为解剖参考,导致传统使用的Cobb角的一个可预测的低估了。一种替代3D超声图像重建方法用于产生对角度测量多个横向特性冠状图像。本研究的目的是测试的可靠性和该角度的有效性,超声曲线角度(UCA),并比较与UCA科布对患者的X射线图像与角和AIS.Materials methodsThis研究分为:1)的两个评价者用于测量UCA和两个操作员,用于获取超声图像之间的帧内译码和帧间可靠性调查; 2)的放射线Cobb角和UCA之间的有效性的研究。 50例和164例AIS,分别列入两个阶段。对患者进行双平面透视和3D超声扫描在同一天。所提出的UCA用于从超声冠状图像,将其使用新定制的体积投影成像(VPI)法形成测量冠状曲率。的UCA的帧内评估者/运营商和评定者间和操作可靠性,通过组内相关系数(ICC)(3,1)和(2,1)分别测试。相比于放射线Cobb角UCA测量的有效性是由法间ICC(2,1),平均绝对差(MAD),测量的标准误差(SEM),Pearson相关系数和奥特曼统计测试。显着性水平设定为0.05.ResultsExcellent帧内评价者和操作符内部的(ICC(3,1)≥0.973)和优良的间评估者和运营商间的可靠性(ICC(2,1)≥0.925),用于测量UCA与被证明为两个主胸椎和(胸)腰椎曲率°整体MAD和SEM不大于3.5°和1.7。非常均UCA和Cobb角为主要胸椎(R2 = 0.893)和(胸)腰椎(R2 = 0.884)曲线之间观察到良好的相关性。在放射线照相科布和UCA方面的均值(SD)测量是27.2±?? ?? 11.6°和26.3±?? ?? 11.4°对于主胸椎曲线;和26.2±?? ?? 11.4°和24.8±?? ?? 9.7°为(胸)腰部曲线。一百六十四个科目(33名男性和131名女性受试者; 11-18岁,平均15.1±?? ??1.9年)被列入了有效会话。优良-方法间的变化(ICC(2,K)≥0.933)与被证明为两个主胸椎和(胸)腰椎曲率°整体MAD和SEM不大于3.0°和1.5。此外,奥特曼地块证明超声和放射学科布measurements.ConclusionIn这项研究之间的可接受的协议,很好的相关性和协议超声和脊柱侧凸曲率的X射线测量之间进行了论证。从本研究的有希望的结果来看,患者AIS与曲线的不同严重程度进行评价,并通过超声成像监测,减少辐射的随访期间的使用。这种方法也可用于本文的侧凸screening.The平移潜力:从3D超声成像系统获得超声曲线角(UCA)可以在患者的AIS冠状曲率提供可靠和有效的评价,而不需要辐射。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号