首页> 外文期刊>EFSA supporting publications >Response to comments on the Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to coffee C21 and protection of DNA from strand breaks pursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
【24h】

Response to comments on the Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to coffee C21 and protection of DNA from strand breaks pursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

机译:回应关于营养,新型食品和食品过敏原(NDA)对咖啡C21相关的健康索赔的科学证实的评论,并根据条例第13.5条(EC)第13.5条,保护与链中的DNA保护DNA 没有1924/2006

获取原文
       

摘要

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to review the scientific comments received on the Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA) on the scientific substantiation of a health claim related to coffee C21 and protection of DNA from strand breakspursuant to Article 13.5 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. Comments originating from the applicant (TchiboGmbH) were submitted to EFSA via the European Commission services. EFSA has reviewed the comments with the contribution of the chair of the NDA Working Group on Claims, the chair of the NDA Panel and the Working Group on Claims of the NDA Panel. In its opinion adopted on 25February 2020 the EFSA Panel onNutrition, Novel Foods andFood Allergens (NDA) concluded that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption ofcoffee C21 and protection of DNA from strand breaks. The comments received do not require any change in the conclusions of the NDA Panel.
机译:遵循欧盟委员会的请求后,EFSA被要求审查关于营养,新型食品和食品过敏原(NDA)的EFSA小组科学意见的科学意见,并对与咖啡C21和保护有关的健康索赔的科学证实DNA从Strand Breakspsuant组成第13.5条(EC)No 1924/2006。来自申请人(TchibogmbH)的评论通过欧洲委员会服务提交给EFSA。 EFSA已审查了索赔主席申请主席,索赔,纳达小组主席和“债券小组索赔的工作组”的贡献。在其舆论通过25令吉2020年,EFSA面板onnutition,新的食物和食品过敏原(NDA)得出结论,在Coffee C21的消费与来自Strand Break的DNA的保护之间尚未确定原因和效应关系。收到的评论不需要任何改变NDA小组的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号