首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Urology >Testing for BRCA1/2 and ataxiatelangiectasia mutated in men with high prostate indices: An approach to reducing prostate cancer mortality in Asia and Africa
【24h】

Testing for BRCA1/2 and ataxiatelangiectasia mutated in men with high prostate indices: An approach to reducing prostate cancer mortality in Asia and Africa

机译:在具有高前列索引的男性中突变的斜体>和斜视激活的斜体>和阿延突齐肌;一种降低亚洲和非洲前列腺癌死亡率的方法

获取原文
       

摘要

A recently published review article titled “Current progress and questions in germline genetic of prostate cancer” enumerated some pertinent questions which impact on prostate cancer (PCa) surveillance and management [1]. Literature across the world reveals that the age- standardized incidence rate per 100 000 of PCa is lower in Asia (11.5) and Africa (26.6) when compared with Latin America/Caribbean (56.4), Europe (62.1) and Oceania (79.1); surprisingly the mortality rate per new case is higher in Africa (52.2%) and Asia (39.8%) when compared with Europe (23.9%), Oceania (19.1%), and Latin America/Carib- bean (16.8%) [2]. Globally, screening for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is an approach aimed at identifying PCa at its early stages. However, early identification of individuals at risk of developing aggressive/lethal PCa remains a chal- lenge among clinicians. A follow-up study carried out in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland showed that 4.3% and 5.8% of those carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations developed PCa with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 2.4 and 4.5, respectively [3]. However, the study was not explicit on whether the patients developed lethal or indolent PCa. Another study carried out in the UK revealed that after 3 years of active histological follow-up, 5.2%, 3.4%, 3.0%, and 2.7% of BRCA2 carriers, BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 non-carriers, and BRCA1 non-carriers developed aggressive PCa, respec- tively [4]. Nyberg et al. [3] observed that those with a pos- itive family history have SIR of 3.2 and 7.3 for BRCA1 and BRCA2 while those with a negative family history have SIR of 2.3 and 3.9 for BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. In the United State (US), a 26 years follow-up exercise revealed that 13.0% of actively monitored men developed PCa, out of which 13.9% developed aggressive PCa [5]. Evidence showed that the frequency of pathogenic mutations was higher in pa- tients with aggressive PCa (6.1%) than in patients with localized PCa (1.4%) [6]. The frequency of BRCA1, BRCA2, and ataxiatelangiectasia mutated (ATM) were higher in aggressive PCa (0.6%, 3.5%, and 1.9%) than in localized PCa (0.4%, 0.8%, and 0.4%, respectively). This suggests that apart from BRCA2 mutation, BRCA1 mutation and ATM play critical roles in the development of aggressive carcinogenesis. However, the extent to which the germline mutations drive carcinogenesis differs with race and across continents. Na et al. [6] showed that carrier rates of pathogenic mutations of BRCA1/2, ATM, and DNA repair genes (DRGs) are higher in Chinese (0.0%/13.6%, 4.6%, and 18.2%) than in Caucasians (0.8%/3.1%, 1.5%, and 5.4%) and African American (0.0%/ 0.0%, 3.3%, and 3.3%, respectively). Chandrasekar et al. [7] observed that the prevalences of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), hereditary cancer syndrome (HCS), and hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) were higher in African American than in Caucasians while the prevalences of Lynch syndrome (LS) was higher in African American than in Cau- casians, with differences of 7.2%, 4.2%, 1.2% and 3.5%, respectively. They observed that the prevalence of HCS, HBOC, and LS connected to family history were higher in African American than in Caucasians with a difference of 12.6%, 15.6%, and 15.6%, respectively. From their study, the prevalences of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were higher in African American (14.3% and 3.6%, respectively) than in Caucasians (5.0% and 3.5%, respectively) while the prevalence of ATM was higher in Caucasians (0.7%) than in African American (0.0%).
机译:最近发表的审查文章标题为“前列腺癌的水果癌中的当前进度和问题”枚举了一些影响前列腺癌(PCA)监测和管理[1]的相关问题。世界各地的文学揭示了与拉丁美洲/加勒比人(56.4),欧洲(62.1)和大洋洲(79.1)相比,亚洲(11.5)和非洲(26.6)中亚洲(11.5)和非洲(26.6)的年龄标准化的发病率较低;令人惊讶的是,与欧洲(23.9%),大洋洲(19.1%)和拉丁美洲/加勒比(16.8%)(16.8%)[2]相比,非洲(52.2%)和亚洲(52.2%)和亚洲的死亡率(39.8%)(39.8%) 。在全球范围内,对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的筛选是一种旨在在其早期阶段识别PCA的方法。然而,患有发育侵袭性/致死PCA的危险风险的个体的早期鉴定仍然是临床医生的核心。在英国(英国)和爱尔兰开展的后续研究表明,4.3%和5.8%携带BRCA1和BRCA2突变的PCA分别为2.4和4.5的标准发生率(SIR),分别[3]。然而,该研究没有明确患者是否发展致命或惰性PCA。在英国进行的另一项研究表明,3年后的活动组织学随访后,5.2%,3.4%,3.0%和2.7%的BRCA2载体,BRCA1载体,BRCA2非载体和BRCA1非载体产生了侵略性PCA,重新检查[4]。 Nyberg等人。 [3]观察到具有POSIVE家族历史的人具有3.2和7.3的SIR,用于BRCA1和BRCA2,而具有负家庭历史的人分别为BRCA1和BRCA2的2.3和3.9。在美国(美国),26年的后续运动表明,13.0%的积极监测男性开发了PCA,其中13.9%发达了侵略性PCA [5]。证据表明,致病性PCA(6.1%)的致病性突变的频率高于局部PCA(1.4%)[6]的患者。 BRCA1,BRCA2和AtaxiatAlangiectasia突变(ATM)的频率高于局部PCA(分别为0.6%,0.8%和0.4%)的侵蚀性PCA(0.6%,3.5%和1.9%)。这表明除了BRCA2突变外,BRCA1突变和ATM在侵袭性致癌作用的发育中发挥着关键作用。然而,种系突变驱动致癌发生的程度与种族和跨越大洲不同。 na等人。 [6]表明,BRCA1 / 2,ATM和DNA修复基因(DRG)的致病性突变的载流子率高于高加索人(0.0%/ 13.6%,4.6%)(0.0%/ 13.6%,4.6%)(0.8%/ 3.1 %,1.5%和5.4%)和非洲裔美国人(0.0%/ 0.0%,3.3%和3.3%)。 Chandrasekar等人。 [7]观察到遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC),遗传性癌症综合征(HCS)和遗传性前列腺癌(HPC)的患病率在非洲裔美国人中较高,而Lynch综合征(LS)的患病率较高在非洲裔美国人中,差异分别为7.2%,4.2%,1.2%和3.5%。他们观察到,非洲裔美国人民币,HBOC和LS的患病率在非洲裔美国人中的患者比高加索人在白种人中,分别差异为12.6%,15.6%和15.6%。从他们的研究来看,BRCA1和BRCA2的患病率在非洲裔美国人(分别为14.3%和3.6%)(分别为5.0%和3.5%),而ATM的患病率高于高加索人(0.7%)比在非裔美国人(0.0%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号