首页> 外文期刊>PLoS Computational Biology >After the honeymoon, the divorce: Unexpected outcomes of disease control measures against endemic infections
【24h】

After the honeymoon, the divorce: Unexpected outcomes of disease control measures against endemic infections

机译:蜜月之后,离婚:疾病控制措施的意外结果对抗流动性感染

获取原文
           

摘要

The lack of effective vaccines for many endemic diseases often forces policymakers to rely on non-immunizing control measures, such as vector control, to reduce the massive burden of these diseases. Controls can have well-known counterintuitive effects on endemic infections, including the honeymoon effect, in which partially effective controls cause not only a greater initial reduction in infection than expected, but also large outbreaks during control resulting from accumulation of susceptibles. Unfortunately, many control measures cannot be maintained indefinitely, and the results of cessation are poorly understood. Here, we examine the results of stopped or failed non-immunizing control measures in endemic settings. By using a mathematical model to compare the cumulative number of cases expected with and without control, we show that deployment of control can lead to a larger total number of infections, counting from the time that control started, than without any control–the divorce effect. This result is directly related to the population-level loss of immunity resulting from non-immunizing controls and is seen in a variety of models when non-immunizing controls are used against an infection that confers immunity. Finally, we examine three control plans for minimizing the magnitude of the divorce effect in seasonal infections and show that they are incapable of eliminating the divorce effect. While we do not suggest stopping control programs that rely on non-immunizing controls, our results strongly argue that the accumulation of susceptibility should be considered before deploying such controls against endemic infections when indefinite use of the control is unlikely. We highlight that our results are particularly germane to endemic mosquito-borne infections, such as dengue virus, both for routine management involving vector control and for field trials of novel control approaches, and in the context of non-pharmaceutical interventions aimed at COVID-19.
机译:许多地方疾病缺乏有效疫苗往往迫使政策制定者依靠非免疫控制措施,例如载体控制,从而减少这些疾病的大规模负担。对照可以对流动感染具有众所周知的违反直觉作用,包括蜜月效应,其中部分有效的对照导致感染的更大初始降低而不是预期的,而且在对易感的积累产生的控制过程中也是大的爆发。不幸的是,许多控制措施无法无限期地维持,停止结果明白很差。在这里,我们检查流行环境中停止或失败的非免疫控制措施的结果。通过使用数学模型来比较预期的累积案件的累计案例,无需控制,我们表明控制的部署可能导致更大的感染总数,从控制开始的时间计数,而不是没有任何控制 - 离婚效应。这一结果直接关系到从非免疫对照所得免疫力的人口级损耗,并见于多种型号当非免疫对照是针对感染赋予免疫力使用。最后,我们研究了三项控制计划,以最大限度地减少离婚效应在季节性感染中的大小,并表明它们无法消除离婚效果。虽然我们不建议停止依赖非免疫控制的控制程序,但我们的结果强烈争辩说,在不确定使用控制时,应在部署此类控制之前考虑易感性的积累。我们强调,我们的结果特别是生命蚊子感染,如登革病毒,涉及涉及载体控制的常规管理和新型控制方法的实地试验,以及针对Covid-19的非药物干预的背景下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号