...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Silvae et Ligni >CAN WE USE DENDROGEOMORPHOLOGY FOR THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF LESS INTENSIVE MASS MOVEMENT PROCESSES? A CASE STUDY OF THREE DEBRIS FLOWS IN NW AND W SLOVENIA
【24h】

CAN WE USE DENDROGEOMORPHOLOGY FOR THE SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF LESS INTENSIVE MASS MOVEMENT PROCESSES? A CASE STUDY OF THREE DEBRIS FLOWS IN NW AND W SLOVENIA

机译:我们可以使用Drendrogeomorphology进行空间和时间分析较小的批量运动过程吗? 在NW和W斯洛文尼亚中的三个碎片流动的案例研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Debris flows can transport large amounts of material and therefore present a significant threat to infrastructure and human life. In this research, we used tree-ring width analyses to quantify the response of trees to three debris flow events in NW Slovenia (Javor??ek, Srpenica) and W Slovenia (Nikova) for which we know the time of origin. We attempted to date these and similar tree responses in the past and compared the patterns between different tree species. Altogether, we sampled 147 trees across a range of tree species (Fagus sylvatica, Pinus sylvestris, Fraxinus excelsior, Fraxinus ornus, Acer pseudoplatanus, Picea abies, Juglans regia, Acer campestre, Tilia cordata and Ostrya carpinifolia), including reference trees that were outside the debris flow fan. For 91 trees, we constructed tree-ring chronologies and used pointer-year analysis to identify years that had abnormal growth. For the remaining trees (mostly Ostrya carpinifolia, Tilia cordata and Acer pseudoplatanus), we either could not accurately distinguish tree rings or two samples from a single tree showed significantly different growth patterns. The growth patterns of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies following debris flow events showed a weak response at the Javor??ek site and no clear responses at the other two sites. Tree species responded similarly at the same locations. Due to the lack of a clear response pattern, we were not able to reconstruct past debris flows.
机译:泥石流可以运输大量材料,因此呈现给基础设施和人的生命显著的威胁。在这项研究中,我们用树木年轮宽度分析,以量化的树木在NW斯洛文尼亚(Javor?EK,Srpenica)和W斯洛文尼亚(Nikova)三大泥石流事件,我们知道起源时的响应。我们试图在过去的日期这些以及类似的树响应和比较不同树种之间的模式。总之,我们在一系列的树种采样147种树木(水青冈,樟子松,欧洲白蜡树,白蜡ornus,宏基pseudoplatanus,欧洲云杉,胡桃,宏基campestre,小叶椴和天目铁carpinifolia),包括参考树木是外泥石流风扇。对于91种树木,我们构建了树木年轮年表和使用指针年的分析,找出十年的那异常生长。对于剩余的树木(主要是天目铁carpinifolia,小叶椴和宏碁pseudoplatanus),我们要么不能准确区分树木年轮或两个样本从一棵树呈显著不同的增长模式。水青冈的以下泥石流活动的增长模式和云杉,结果显示在Javor?EK网站和其他两个网站没有明确的回应微弱的回应。树种在同一位置的反应相似。由于缺乏明确的反应模式中,我们无法重建过去的泥石流灾害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号