首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer >A follow-up study of a randomized controlled study evaluating safety and efficacy of leuprorelin acetate every-3-month depot for 2 versus 3 or more years with tamoxifen for 5?years as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer
【24h】

A follow-up study of a randomized controlled study evaluating safety and efficacy of leuprorelin acetate every-3-month depot for 2 versus 3 or more years with tamoxifen for 5?years as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer

机译:随机对照研究评估Leuprorelin醋酸甘油蛋白的安全性和功效2与三个月为3或更多年的疗效,以5〜3或更多年在预氧化患者中辅助治疗患者的内分泌反应乳腺癌

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Previously, we conducted the 5-year open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of leuprorelin adjuvant therapy in post-operative premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, which was a pilot study to investigate the optimal duration of leuprorelin treatment. Since, however, long-term outcomes became required for the adjuvant endocrine therapy, we performed this follow-up observation study. Methods Follow-up observation study was performed up to 10th year after randomization, continuing RCT to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leuprorelin every 3?months for?≥?3 versus 2?years, with daily tamoxifen for 5?years. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and 2-year landmark DFS. Results Eligible patients ( N ?=?222) were randomly assigned to receive leuprorelin for either 2?years ( N ?=?112) or?≥?3?years ( N ?=?110) with tamoxifen. Leuprorelin treatment for?≥?3?years versus 2?years provided no significant difference in DFS (HR 0.944, 95% CI 0.486–1.8392) or 2-year landmark DFS ( N ?=?99 and 102 in 2-year and?≥?3-year groups, HR 0.834, 0.397–1.753). In small, higher-risk subgroup ( n ?=?17); however, 2-year landmark DFS in?≥?3-year group was significantly longer (HR 0.095, 0.011–0.850) than that in 2-year group. The incidence of bone-related adverse events was around 5% in both groups. Conclusions Adjuvant leuprorelin treatment for?≥?3?years with tamoxifen only showed similar efficacy and safety profiles to those for 2?years in analyses among all patients but suggested greater benefit in higher-risk patients. No new safety signal was identified for long-term leuprorelin treatment. Trial registration number Not applicable. This was an observational study.
机译:背景技术先前,我们在术后前医生患者的患者响应乳腺癌后术后医学患者中进行了5年的开放标签,随机对照试验(RCT),这是一种试验研究,以研究Leuprorelin治疗的最佳持续时间。然而,由于佐剂内分泌治疗所需的长期结果,我们进行了这种后续观察研究。方法后续观察研究最多可在随机化后的第10年,继续RCT评估Leuprorelin每3个月的疗效和安全性吗?≥?3对2年,每年Tamoxifen为5?年。主要终点是无病生存(DFS)和2年的地标DFS。结果符合条件的患者(n?=β222)被随机分配给2岁(n?= 112)或≥?3?年(n?=α110)与他莫昔芬的血糖素。 Leuprorelin治疗?≥?3?年与2年与2年内没有显着差异(HR 0.944,95%CI 0.486-1.8392)或2年的地标DFS(N?=?99和102,2年和? ≥3年组,HR 0.834,0.397-1.753)。在小风险的亚组(n?=?17);然而,2年的地标DFS?≥?3年组明显更长(HR 0.095,0.011-0.850),而不是2年组。两组骨相关不良事件的发生率约为5%。结论佐剂Leuprorelin治疗≥1-3?含他莫昔芬的年份仅对所有患者分析的人分析了2年,但在较高风险的患者中表达了更大的益处,只表现出类似的疗效和安全谱。没有鉴定新的安全信号,用于长期Leuprorelin治疗。试验登记号码不适用。这是一个观察性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号