首页> 外文期刊>Beijing Law Review >The Legitimacy of Military Intervention in Yemen and Its Impacts
【24h】

The Legitimacy of Military Intervention in Yemen and Its Impacts

机译:也门军事干预的合法性及其影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Recently, some Arab governments, including Yemen, have requested other states to intervene militarily to eliminate the protests and popular movements that challenge their powers under the justifications for consensual interventions, resulting in the emergence of armed civil conflicts many violations of human rights. This type of interference contradicts the provisions of the United Nations Charter and other international conventions that prohibit military force in international relations. However, this interference almost becomes recognized by states without any opposition. For more than six years, no initiatives have been made to resolve the dispute between the parties involved in Yemen’s war because Yemen is considered less strategically important for the permanent members’ interests than Saudi Arabia. As with other problems and humanitarian crises (Syria and Libya), the UNSC member states tend to leave Yemen’s diplomatic initiatives to the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General.
机译:最近,包括也门在内的阿拉伯政府,已要求其他国家进行军事化,以消除抗议和流行的抗议活动,以便在致密的经济处理中挑战他们的权力,导致武装民事冲突的出现许多侵犯人权的出现。这种干涉与联合国宪章和其他禁止国际关系中的国际公约的规定相矛盾。然而,这种干扰几乎被各国识别,没有任何反对。超过六年,没有举措解决也门战争所涉及的各方之间的争议,因为也门被认为对常任常任常任委员的利益不太战略性重要。与其他问题和人道主义危机一样(叙利亚和利比亚),联合国成员国倾向于将也门的外交倡议留给秘书长的特使。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号