...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion
【24h】

The Effect of Domestication and Experience on the Social Interaction of Dogs and Wolves With a Human Companion

机译:驯化与经验对人类伴侣狗和狼的社会互动的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The results of current wolf-dog studies on human-directed behaviours seem to suggest that domestication has acted on dogs’ general attitudes and not on specific socio-cognitive skills. A recent hypothesis suggests that domestication may have increased dogs’ overall sociability (hypersociability hypothesis). The aim of the present study was to test one aspect of the hypersociability hypothesis, whereby dogs should be more interested in social human contact compared to wolves, and to investigate the relative roles of both domestication and experience on the value that dogs attribute to human social contact. We compared equally raised wolves and dogs kept at the Wolf Science Center (WSCw, WSCd) but also dogs with different human socialization experiences i.e. pet dogs and free-ranging dogs. We presented subjects with a simple test, divided in two phases: in the Pre-test phase animals were exposed to two people in succession. One person invited the animal for a social/cuddle session (contact provider) and the other fed the animal (food provider). In the Test phase, animals could choose which of the two persons to approach, when both stood in a neutral posture. We directly compared WSCd with WSCw and free-ranging dogs with pet dogs. We found that in the Pre-test, WSCd and free-ranging dogs spent more time with the contact provider than WSCw and pet dogs, respectively. The results regarding the free-ranging dog and pet dog comparison were surprising, hence we conducted a follow-up testing pet dogs in a familiar, distraction-free area. Free-ranging dogs and this group of pet dogs did not differ in the time spent cuddling. In the test phase, WSCd were more likely than WSCw to approach the two experimenters. However, neither for the WSCd-WSCw comparison nor for the free-ranging dogs-pet dogs comparison, we could find a clear preference for one person over the other. Our findings support the idea that domestication has affected dogs’ behaviour in terms of their overall interest in being in proximity with a human partner also in case of dogs with a relatively sparse socialization experience (free-ranging dogs). However, it remains unclear what the driving motivation to interact with the human may be.
机译:目前狼犬研究人体定向行为的研究似乎表明,驯化是对狗的一般态度而不是特定的社会认知技能。最近的假设表明,驯化可能增加了狗的总体社交性(不受约比的假设)。目前研究的目的是测试一个问题的一个方面,与狼相比,狗应该对社会人体接触更感兴趣,并调查驯化和经验对狗归因于人类社会价值的相对角色接触。我们比较了在狼科学中心(WSCW,WSCD)的狼群和狗相同的狼和狗,而且还有不同的人类社会化经验的狗,即宠物狗和自由养犬。我们用简单的测试提出了主题,分为两阶段:在预先测试期间,继承中,动物暴露于两人。一个人邀请了动物的社交/拥抱会话(联系提供商)和另一个美联储动物(食品提供商)。在测试阶段,当两者都在中性姿势时,动物可以选择哪两个人接近。我们将WSCD与WSCW和免费的狗与宠物狗相比相比。我们发现,在预先测试中,分别使用与WSCW和宠物狗的联系提供商更多的时间使用更多的时间与WSCW和Pet Dog。关于自由量狗和宠物狗比较的结果令人惊讶,因此我们在熟悉的令人不安的地区进行了一只后续测试宠物狗。免费的狗和这群宠物狗在拥抱时没有差异。在测试阶段,WSCD比WSCW更可能接近两个实验者。然而,对于WSCD-WSCW的比较而不是免费的狗 - 宠物狗比较,我们可以找到一个人对另一个人的清晰偏好。我们的调查结果支持驯化在其整体兴趣与人类伴侣靠近人类伴侣的情况下,驯化的想法也适用于社会化经验(自由范围的狗)。然而,它仍然尚不清楚与人类互动的驾驶动机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号