首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating implementation of a fire prevention Injury Prevention Briefing in children’s centres: study protocol
【24h】

Multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating implementation of a fire prevention Injury Prevention Briefing in children’s centres: study protocol

机译:多中心集团随机对照试验评估儿童中心防火损伤预防促进促进意识的实施:研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The UK has one of the highest fatality rates for deaths from fire-related injuries in children aged 0–14?years; these injuries have the steepest social gradient of all injuries in the UK. Children’s centres provide children under five years old and their families with a range of services and information, including home safety, but their effectiveness in promoting injury prevention has yet to be evaluated. We developed a fire prevention intervention for use in children’s centres comprising an Injury Prevention Briefing (IPB) which provides evidence on what works and best practice from those running injury prevention programmes, and a facilitation package to support implementation of the IPB. This protocol describes the design and methods of a trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the IPB and facilitation package in promoting fire prevention. Methods/Design Pragmatic, multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial, with a nested qualitative study, in four study centres in England. Children’s centres in the most disadvantaged areas will be eligible to participate and will be randomised to one of three treatment arms comprising: IPB with facilitation package; IPB with no facilitation package; usual care (control). The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of families who have a fire escape plan at follow-up. Eleven children’s centres per arm are required to detect an absolute difference in the percentage of families with a fire escape plan of 20% in either of the two intervention arms compared with the control arm, with 80% power and a 5% significance level (2-sided), an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.05 and assuming outcomes are assessed on 20 families per children’s centre. Secondary outcomes include the assessment of the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, other fire safety behaviours and factors associated with degree of implementation of the IPB. Discussion This will be the first trial to develop and evaluate a fire prevention intervention for use in children’s centres in the UK. Its findings will be generalisable to children’s centres in the most disadvantaged areas of the UK and may also be generalisable to similar interventions to prevent other types of injury. Trial registration http://NCT01452191 webcite (date of registration: 13/10/2011).
机译:背景技术英国有0-14岁的儿童的有关伤害死亡人数最高的死亡率之一;年份;这些伤害具有英国所有伤害的最陡的社会梯度。儿童中心为5岁以下的儿童提供了5岁的儿童及其家庭,拥有一系列服务和信息,包括家庭安全,但它们在促进预防损害的有效性尚未得到评估。我们开发了用于儿童中心的消防干预,包括伤害预防简报(IPB),提供有关运行伤害预防计划的有效和最佳实践的证据,以及支持实施IPB的促进方案。本协议描述了试验的设计和方法,评估了IPB和促进促进防火方面的促进包装的有效性和成本效益。方法/设计务实,多期间聚类随机对照试验,在英格兰的四个学习中心中嵌套定性研究。儿童中心在最弱势地区将有资格参与,并将随机分配到三个处理武器之一,包括:IPB与便利包; IPB没有便利包;常规护理(控制)。主要结果措施将是在随访中有火灾逃生计划的家庭的比例。每只手臂的11个儿童中心是在与控制臂相比的两个干预臂中的任何一个百分比的家庭百分比的绝对差异,以80%的功率和5%的显着性水平(2 (共用),在每名儿童中心的20个家庭中评估0.05的内部相关系数和假设结果。二次结果包括评估干预的成本效益,其他消防安全行为和与IPB实施程度相关的因素。讨论这将是第一次开发和评估在英国儿童中心使用的防火干预的审判。其调查结果将在英国最不利地区的儿童中心普遍,也可能普遍存在类似干预措施,以防止其他类型的伤害。试用注册http:// nct01452191 webcite(注册日期:13/10/2011)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号