...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages
【24h】

Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages

机译:比较疫苗和反疫苗接近的质量:疫苗接种相关网页的内容分析

获取原文

摘要

The exponential increase in health-related online platforms has made the Internet one of the main sources of health information globally. The quality of health contents disseminated on the Internet has been a central focus for many researchers. To date, however, few comparative content analyses of pro- and anti-vaccination websites have been conducted, and none of them compared the quality of information. The main objective of this study was therefore to bring new evidence on this aspect by comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online sources. Based on past literature and health information quality evaluation initiatives, a 40-categories assessment tool (Online Vaccination Information Quality Codebook) was developed and used to code a sample of 1093 webpages retrieved via Google and two filtered versions of the same search engine. The categories investigated were grouped into four main quality dimensions: web-related design quality criteria (10 categories), health-specific design quality criteria (3 categories), health related content attributes (12 categories) and vaccination-specific content attributes (15 categories). Data analysis comprised frequency counts, cross tabulations, Pearson’s chi-square, and other inferential indicators. The final sample included 514 webpages in favor of vaccination, 471 against, and 108 neutral. Generally, webpages holding a favorable view toward vaccination presented more quality indicators compared to both neutral and anti-vaccination pages. However, some notable exceptions to this rule were observed. In particular, no differences were found between pro- and anti-vaccination webpages as regards vaccination-specific content attributes. Our analyses showed that the overall quality of pro-vaccination webpages is superior to anti-vaccination online sources. The developed coding scheme was proven to be a helpful and reliable tool to judge the quality of vaccination-related webpages. Based on the results, we advance recommendations for online health information providers as well as directions for future research in this field.
机译:与健康相关的在线平台的指数增加使互联网成为全球健康信息的主要来源之一。在互联网上传播的健康内容质量一直是许多研究人员的核心焦点。然而,迄今为止,已经进行了近期和反疫苗接种网站的少数比较内容分析,并且它们都不是与信息质量进行了比较。因此,本研究的主要目的是通过比较促进疫苗和反疫苗的质量来提高这方面的新证据。基于过去的文献和健康信息质量评估计划,开发了40类评估工具(在线疫苗接种信息质量码本),并用于编写通过Google和两个过滤版本的同一搜索引擎检索的1093个网页的样本。调查的类别被分为四个主要质量尺寸:网络相关的设计质量标准(10个类别),特定于健康的设计质量标准(3个类别),健康相关内容属性(12个类别)和疫苗接种特定的内容属性(15个类别)。数据分析包括频率计数,交叉表格,Pearson的Chi-Square和其他推理指标。最终样品包括514个网页,有利于疫苗接种,471反对和108个中性。通常,与中性和抗疫苗接种页面相比,持有有利的疫苗接种观察的网页呈现出更多的质量指标。但是,观察到此规则的一些显着例外。特别是,在疫苗接种特定的内容属性方面没有发现抗疫苗接种网页之间的差异。我们的分析表明,Pro-acmcination网页的整体质量优于反疫苗接种在线来源。已被证明开发的编码方案是一个有用而可靠的工具,可以判断与疫苗接种相关的网页的质量。根据结果​​,我们推荐在线健康信息提供商的建议以及该领域未来研究的指示。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号