...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Physics/Association of Medical Physicists of India >Dosimetric Comparison of Different Planning Techniques in Left-sided Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Planning Study
【24h】

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Planning Techniques in Left-sided Whole-Breast Irradiation: A Planning Study

机译:左侧全乳房辐射不同规划技术的剂量比较:规划研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose: This planning study compared the various dosimetric parameters of different types of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Treatment of 22 left-sided breast cases was planned using two IMRT and VMAT techniques for the prescription of 40 Gy in 15 fractions. For tangential IMRT (Tan_IMRT), five beams were placed as conventional tangential beams. For equally spaced IMRT (Equi_IMRT), six beams were placed equidistantly at 40° interval from 300° to 140°. For tangential VMAT (Tan_VMAT), two arcs were used with the avoidance sector in such a way that the beam covered like tangential fields. For full-arc VMAT (Full_VMAT), similar arcs as Tan_VMAT were used, without avoidance sector. All treatment plans were generated using Eclipse planning system for TrueBeam STx linear accelerator. For planning target volume (PTV), dose parameters including D 95% , D 99% , V 105% homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) were analyzed. Different dose parameters for the left lung, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), right lung, and right breast were also analyzed. In addition, low-dose spillage in the normal tissues and the number of monitor units (MUs) required for the treatment were compared. Results: IMRT technique exhibited superior D 95% and D 99% for PTV compared with VMAT techniques. VMAT plans provided more V 105% (6%) compared with that of IMRT plans (approximately 1%). HI was better in IMRT plans (Tan_IMRT, 0.085 ± 0.015; Equi_IMRT, 0.094 ± 0.011) than in VMAT plans. CI was better in VMAT plans. The mean lung dose (7.7 Gy ± 1.788 Gy) and V 5Gy (34.99% ± 6.799%) were better achieved in Tan_IMRT plan than other plans. Right lung, heart, and right breast sparing were better achieved in Tan_IMRT plan. Moreover, low-dose spillage was very less in the Tan_IMRT compared with all other techniques. Conclusion: Dosimetric comparison in this study showed that tangential IMRT technique is superior in terms of target coverage, sparing of lung, heart, and right breast, and low-dose spillage control in the left-sided breast-only radiotherapy.
机译:目的:该计划研究比较了不同类型的强度调制放疗(IMRT)和体积调制的Acc治疗(VMAT)技术的各种剂量分析,用于左侧乳腺癌放射治疗。材料和方法:使用两种IMRT和VMAT技术进行了治疗22例左侧乳房案例,用于15分数中40倍的处方。对于切向IMRT(TAN_IMRT),将五个光束作为传统的切向梁放置。对于等距间隔的IMRT(Equi_imrt),六个光束以300°至140°等40°间隔地置于40°至140°。对于切向VMAT(TAN_VMAT),两个弧与避免扇区一起使用,使得光束如切向字段覆盖。对于全弧VMAT(Full_vmat),使用与Tan_Vmat类似的弧,而无需避免扇区。使用Eclipse STX线性加速器生成所有处理计划。对于规划目标体积(PTV),分析包括D 95%,D 99%,V 105%均匀性指数(HI)和符合性指数(CI)的剂量参数。还分析了左肺,心脏,左前期下降动脉(LAD),右肺和右乳房的不同剂量参数。此外,比较了治疗所需的正常组织中的低剂量溢出和监测单元(MUS)。结果:与VMAT技术相比,IMRT技术表现出PTV的优越D 95%和D 99%。与IMRT计划相比,VMAT计划提供更多V 105%(6%)(约1%)。嗨在IMRT计划中更好(Tan_imrt,0.085±0.015; Equi_imrt,0.094±0.011)比VMAT计划更好。 CI在VMAT计划中更好。在Tan_imrt计划中,平均肺剂量(7.7 Gy±1.788 Gy)和V 5Gy(34.99%±6.799%)比其他计划更好地实现。在Tan_imrt计划中更好地实现了右肺,心脏和右乳房备件。此外,与所有其他技术相比,在Tan_imrt中,低剂量溢出物质非常少。结论:本研究中的剂量比较表明,切向IMRT技术在目标覆盖率,肺,心脏和右乳房的备件中,左侧乳房放射治疗的低剂量溢出控制。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号