首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Interdisciplinary Histopathology >THE PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE TEST (PAT): A NEW TEACHING STRATEGY TO ENSURE STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN LEARNING -
【24h】

THE PARTICIPATION ASSURANCE TEST (PAT): A NEW TEACHING STRATEGY TO ENSURE STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN LEARNING -

机译:参与保证测试(PAT):一种新的教学策略,以确保学生参与学习 -

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Participation of students in learning determines their scholastic achievements. Current teaching systems do not assess student participation in learning, rather provide grades based on knowledge recall. Objective: To develop and evaluate a teaching strategy that can provide a standardized measure of student engagement in the learning process. Materials & Methods: A quasi-experimental study undertaken in Rehman Medical College, Peshawar, KP, Pakistan (March-May 2018) involved 96 medical students (16 groups) of third professional MBBS present in Small Group Format (SGF) session on medical research. Participation Assurance Test (PAT), administered after the lesson involved i) written iPAT for individual performance, ii) written tPAT for team performance, iii) perception-based peer evaluation pPAT for rating team members, and iv) Observer based oPAT by facilitator for intra-group and inter-group dynamics. Scores in numerical and Likert scales were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 for descriptive and comparative analysis and correlations, keeping p≤0.05 significant. Results: Mean iPAT was 54.66?12.80 compared to mean tPAT 75.96?19.85 (p≤0.001), mean pPAT was 20.83?5.14 compared to mean oPAT of 16.50?4.99 (p≤0.001), and mean Closed Group oPAT was 4.19?1.90 compared to Open Group oPAT of 12.31?3.40 (p≤0.001). Significant correlation was obtained for iPAT and tPAT (r=0.564, p=0.023). The groups achieving ≥60 iPAT marks showed significant correlations of iPAT with tPAT (r=0.869, p=0.024) and closed group oPAT (r=-0.882, p=0.017); groups scoring below 60 in iPAT showed significant correlations of iPAT with tPAT (r=0.749, p=0.013), open group oPAT (r=0.636, p=0.048), and total oPAT (r=0.635, p=0.048). Conclusion: Participation Assurance Test was effective in assessing individual and team-based student participation and supports the adoption of Open Group teaching strategy as more effective for student participation in learning.
机译:简介:学生参与学习的参与决定了他们的学术成就。目前的教学系统不评估学生参与学习,而不是根据知识召回提供等级。目的:制定和评估一个教学策略,可以在学习过程中提供学生参与的标准化措施。材料和方法:在康瑟曼医学院,Peshawar,KP,巴基斯坦(2018年3月)中进行了准实验研究,涉及96名医学生(16组)的第三次专业MBBS,以小型群体格式(SGF)会议提供医学研究。在课程后,课程介绍的参与保证测试(PAT),I)为个人绩效,ii)编写了TPAT的团队业绩,III基于的同行评估PPAT为评级团队成员和IV的观察者由促进者为基础的OPAT内部和组间动态。通过SPSS 22.0分析数值和李克特级别的分数以进行描述性和比较分析和相关性,保持P≤0.05。结果:平均iPat为54.66?12.80相比平均tpat 75.96?19.85(p≤0.001),平均ppat为20.83?5.14与16.50 of 16.50(p≤0.001)相比,平均闭合组opat 4.19?1.90与开放组OPAT为12.31?3.40(p≤0.001)。为iPat和TPAT获得显着的相关性(r = 0.564,p = 0.023)。达到≥60iPat标记的组显示IPAT与TPAT的显着相关性(r = 0.869,p = 0.024)和闭合组OPAT(r = -0.882,p = 0.017); IPAT中60以下的群体评分显示IPAT与TPAT的显着相关性(r = 0.749,p = 0.013),开放组OPAT(r = 0.636,p = 0.048),总OPAT(r = 0.635,p = 0.048)。结论:参与保证考试在评估基于团队的学生参与方面有效,并支持通过开放组教学策略,对学生参与学习更有效。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号