首页> 外文期刊>JSES Open Access >Ambulatory versus inpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of trends, outcomes, and charges
【24h】

Ambulatory versus inpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of trends, outcomes, and charges

机译:Absulatory与住院肩关节置换术:趋势,结果和收费的基于人口的分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Background:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) compared with SA performed in hospital-based surgery settings.Methods:The State Inpatient Databases and the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases were queried for patients undergoing primary or reverse SA between 2010 and 2014 in 5 states in either the inpatient (IP), hospital outpatient department (HOPD), or ASC setting. Outcomes included all-cause readmissions, emergency department visits within the 90-day postoperative period, and charges. Covariates included patient demographic data and procedure details. Risk factors for readmission were calculated using logistic regression analysis.Results:We identified 795 ASC (2%), 183 HOPD (0.5%), 38,114 (97.5%) SA procedures. The outpatient cohort was overall younger and healthier with a lower percentage of diabetes (14.1% vs. 20.2%), cardiopulmonary disease (11.4% vs. 20.4%), and obesity (10.7% vs. 15.6%). The US state and obesity were factors significantly (P .0001) associated with readmission. The median IP charge was $62,905 (range, $41,327-$87,881) vs. $37,395 (range, $21,976-$61,775) for combined outpatient cases. When outpatient SA was stratified into ASC and HOPD cases, the median charges were $31,790 for ASC cases vs. $55,990 for HOPD cases (P .0001). After adjustment for multiple covariates, the charges for combined outpatient SA surgery were 40% lower than those for IP SA surgery (P .0001).Conclusion:As the current health care climate shifts toward lower-cost and higher-quality care, this study demonstrates that SAs performed in ASCs have a comparable safety profile to and significant financial advantage over SAs performed in the hospital-based setting.? 2019 The Authors.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是评估与在基于医院的手术设置中的SA相比,在动态手术中心(ASCS)中进行的肩部关节造身术(SA)的临床结果和成本。方法:国家住院数据库和国家外国人在2010年和2014年在住院病人(IP),住院门诊部(HOPD)或ASC环境中,为2010年和2014年在2010年和2014年进行的患者进行了手术数据库。成果包括全面的入院,90天术后期间的急诊部门访问以及收费。协变量包括患者人口统计数据和程序细节。使用Logistic回归分析计算入院的危险因素。结果:我们确定了795 ASC(2%),183跳(0.5%),38,114(97.5%)SA程序。门诊队列的整体年龄小,更健康,糖尿病百分比较低(14.1%vs.2.2%),心肺疾病(11.4%对20.4%)和肥胖(10.7%vs.15.6%)。美国州和肥胖是有关的因素(P <.0001)与入院有关。中位数知识产权收费为62,905美元(范围,41,327美元至87,881美元),适用于外部案例的37,395美元(范围,21,976美元至61,775美元)。当门诊SA被分类为ASC和HOPD病例时,ASC案件的中位数为31,790美元,跳跃病例为55,990美元(P <.0001)。在调整多个协变量后,组合的外腔SA手术的费用低于IP SA手术的40%(P <.0001)。结论:当前医疗保健气候变化到较低成本和更高质量的护理,这研究表明,在基于医院的设置中,在ASCS中执行的SAS在SAS中具有可比的安全性和显着的金融优势。 2019年的作者。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号