...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Transportation Technologies >Comparative Analysis and Assessment of States’ Traffic Management Center Programs
【24h】

Comparative Analysis and Assessment of States’ Traffic Management Center Programs

机译:国家交通管理中心方案的比较分析与评估

获取原文

摘要

This research presents a step-by-step guideline for traffic data collection standards set by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). This study reviews manual and automatic methods of traffic counting and provides detailed information on traffic volume and vehicle classification studies. This research also provides a detailed analysis of the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT)-TMC (Transportation Management Center) websites and compares it to selected Department of Transportation websites of other states such as Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, California, Texas, and Virginia. The purpose of the comparison is to analyze the data sources; user friendliness, accessibility, types of data available, presentation formats, and style for each state to determine how they compared to DelDOT-TMC. Although there were some similarities, the findings suggest that two major differences are present. The overall results revealed that DelDOT-TMC provides limited traffic and roadway weather data, and presentation formats to the public as compared to the other states. Further, a unitless variable, called the Capacity Factor (Q), has been developed within this study to represent this relative comparison. This study shows that DelDOT TMC performs well within the group of selected states and better than selected states of similar size and most selected states of larger size; where only Virginia performs better then DelDOT TMC. DelDOT TMC does not perform as well as selected neighboring states; however, it performs in an acceptable range relative to neighboring states.
机译:本研究提出了运输工程研究所(ITE)和美国国家公路和交通官员(AASHTO)设定的交通数据收集标准的一步一步的准则。本研究审查了手动和自动的交通数目,并提供有关交通量和车辆分类研究的详细信息。本研究还提供了对特拉华州交通处的详细分析(Deldot)-TMC(运输管理中心)网站,并将其与其他国家的交通网站进行比较,如佛蒙特州,康涅狄格州,新泽西州,宾夕法尼亚州,加利福尼亚州,德克萨斯州和弗吉尼亚州。比较的目的是分析数据来源;用户友好性,可访问性,数据类型可用,演示格式和每个状态的样式,以确定与Deldot-TMC相比的方式。虽然有一些相似之处,但调查结果表明存在两个主要差异。总体结果表明,与其他国家相比,Deldot-TMC提供有限的交通和道路天气数据,以及向公众提供展示格式。此外,已经在本研究中开发了一种被称为容量因子(Q)的无单机变量,以表示这种相对比较。本研究表明,Deldot TMC在选定状态组内表现良好,并且比相似大小的选定状态更好,更大的尺寸;只有弗吉尼亚州只能更好地表现更好,然后迪尔多特TMC。 Deldot TMC没有表现和所选邻国;然而,它在相对于邻国的可接受范围内执行。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号