...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Indian Institute of Science >One Hundred Years After the Latimer and Rodebush Paper, Hydrogen Bonding Remains an Elephant!
【24h】

One Hundred Years After the Latimer and Rodebush Paper, Hydrogen Bonding Remains an Elephant!

机译:在海滩和牛仔诗纸后百年,氢键仍然是大象!

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Latimer and Rodebush (J Am Chem Soc 42: 1419–1433, 1920) discussed the ways a Lewis dot structure could be drawn for liquid water and proposed that the H held between two octets constitutes a bond in 1920. When it was realized that the other molecule of life, DNA, owes its double helix structure to specific hydrogen bonds between A–T (two) and C–G (three) base pairs, the interest in hydrogen bonding grew dramatically. While hydrogen bonding could be readily seen in water and DNA, it was not so easy to understand leading to continuous debates about what it means. This article gives a personal perspective of the evolution of hydrogen bonding since the Latimer and Rodebush paper to the recent IUPAC definition of hydrogen bond, published in 2011 and now. Is there a third C–H···O hydrogen bond in the A–T base pair?.
机译:LATIMER和RODEBUSH(JAM CHEM SOC 42:1419-1433,920)讨论了液体水的绘制lewis点结构的方式,并提出在两个八位字节之间保持的H在1920年构成键。当它意识到其他生命分子DNA,其双螺旋结构归因于A-T(两)和C-G(三)碱基对之间的特定氢键,氢键的兴趣急剧增加。氢键可以在水和DNA中容易地看出,但不容易理解导致关于它意味着什么的连续辩论。本文在2011年和现在发表的氢键最近发表的氢键的Iupac定义,提供了氢键的演变的个人视角。在A-T碱基对中是否存在第三个C-H···氢键?

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号