...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. >Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature
【24h】

Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature

机译:临床医生障碍和促进者常规艾滋病毒检测:对文献的系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal. Objectives: This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening. Data Sources: Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018. Eligibility Criteria: Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers’ barriers/facilitators to routine screening. Data Extraction: We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM. Data Synthesis: Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level. Limitations: Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator. Conclusions: Increasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.
机译:背景:常规HIV筛选率是次优。目的:这种系统审查确定了常规艾滋病病毒检测的障碍/促进者,使用社会生态学模型(SEM)分类,并为干预措施提出了增加筛查的建议。数据来源:包括在PubMed,EBSCO Cinahl,Scopus,科学网站和2006年至2018年间的Cochrane图书馆中索引了文章。资格标准:包括英文或西班牙语的研究,并直接评估提供商的障碍/促进者进行常规筛选。数据提取:我们使用标准化Excel模板来提取障碍/辅导员并识别SEM中的级别。数据综合:占主导地位的内在因子,而促进者则指导在制度一级。局限性:政策障碍在各国普遍存在。荟萃分析是不可能的。我们无法量化任何给定屏障/促进者的频率。结论:提高报销和添加筛选作为质量措施可能会激活艾滋病毒检测;但是,许多干预措施需要很少的资源投资。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号