首页> 外文期刊>DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology >Use of Open Access Publishing by Researchers an Analysis of Open Access Availability of Research Literature in the field of Digital Library
【24h】

Use of Open Access Publishing by Researchers an Analysis of Open Access Availability of Research Literature in the field of Digital Library

机译:研究人员在数字图书馆领域开放访问可用性的开放式访问权限分析

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper aims to examine the availability of Open Access (OA) research literature in the field of digital library. In order to analyse the availability of OA research literature in the field of digital library, a search was conducted on Web of Science’s Core collection database on June 11, 2019. In response to a topic search TS = “Digital Library” using the advanced search option, 849 articles were retrieved. Of the 849 articles examined, the details of 26 articles were not found in the Google Scholar. Therefore, 823 articles were selected for further analyses. After examining the Websites of OA articles, they were classified into three categories: gold OA, green OA, and both gold and green OA. Furthermore, all the green OA articles were systematically organised into six groups for the examination of the self-archiving venues used by the researchers for self-archiving. Out of 823 articles analysed, OA versions were found for 64.76 per cent of articles. This study found that 26.68 per cent of OA articles were available through gold OA and 60.39 per cent articles were available through green OA, while 36.53 per cent articles were accessible via both OA journals and self-archiving (gold & green OA). Although researchers used various OA platforms for self-archiving of their research work, publishers’ Websites were found as the most preferred choice for self-archiving of research work by the authors in the field of digital library. Computer Science discipline has the highest share of OA copies available through self-archiving. However, it is important to point out that more than 78 per cent of self-archived articles were found as the final publisher’s PDF versions of the article which publishers never allow for self-archiving.
机译:本文旨在审查数字图书馆领域的开放访问(OA)研究文献的可用性。为了分析数字图书馆领域的OA研究文献的可用性,2019年6月11日在科学核心收集数据库网络上进行了搜索。响应一个主题搜索TS =“数字库”,使用高级搜索选项,检索849篇文章。在审查的849篇文章中,在Google Scholar中没有发现26篇文章的细节。因此,选择了823种物品以进一步分析。在检查OA文章的网站后,他们分为三类:金OA,绿色OA和金色和绿色OA。此外,所有绿色OA文章都被系统地组织成六组,以检查研究人员自我归档的自我归档场地。在823篇文章中分析,OA版本被发现为64.76%的物品。本研究发现,通过Gold OA获得26.68%的OA制品,通过绿色OA获得60.39%的物品,而36.53%的物品可通过OA期刊和自我归档(金色和绿色OA)访问。虽然研究人员使用了各种OA平台进行了研究工作的自我归档,但出版商的网站被发现是数字图书馆领域的作者自我归档研究工作的最优选选择。计算机科学纪律通过自我归档,拥有OA副本的最高份额。但是,指出,指出,超过78%的自我归档物品被发现作为出版商永远不会允许自我归档的物品的最终出版商的PDF版本。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号