首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Physiological Anthropology >Degree of exercise intensity during continuous chest compression in upper-body-trained individuals
【24h】

Degree of exercise intensity during continuous chest compression in upper-body-trained individuals

机译:上半身训练的个体连续胸部压缩过程中的运动强度程度

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Although chest-compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCO-CPR) is recommended for lay bystanders, fatigue is easily produced during CCO-CPR. If CCO-CPR can be performed at a lower intensity of exercise, higher resistance to fatigue is expected. Since chest compression is considered to be a submaximal upper body exercise in a steady rhythm and since the unit of load for chest compression is expressed as work rate, we investigated the possibility that peak work rate of the upper body determines the level of exercise intensity during CCO-CPR. Twelve sedentary individuals (group Se), 11 rugby players (group R), and 11 swimmers (group Sw) performed 10-min CCO-CPR, and heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured as indices of exercise intensity. Multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to assess potential relationships of upper body weight, peak lumbar extension force, peak work rate, and peak oxygen uptake recorded during arm-crank exercise with HR and RPE during CCO-CPR. Values of peak work rate during arm-crank exercise (Peak WR-AC) in group Se, group R, and group Sw were 108?±?12, 139?±?27, and 146?±?24 watts, respectively. Values of the latter two groups were significantly higher than the value of group Se (group R, P??0.01; group Sw, P??0.001). HR during CCO-CPR increased with time, reaching 127.8?±?17.6, 114.8?±?16.5, and 118.1?±?14.2 bpm at the 10th minute in group Se, group R, and group Sw, respectively. On the other hand, RPE during CCO-CPR increased with time, reaching 16.4?±?1.4, 15.4?±?1.7, and 13.9?±?2.2 at the 10th minute in group Se, group R, and group Sw, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that only peak WR-AC affects both HR and RPE at the 10th minute of CCO-CPR (HR, r?=?-0.458; P??0.01; RPE, r?=?-0.384, P??0.05). The degree of exercise intensity during CCO-CPR is lower in individuals who have a higher peak work rate of the upper body.
机译:尽管仅用于旁边的旁边的胸部压缩的心肺复苏(CCO-CPR),但在CCO-CPR期间容易产生疲劳。如果CCO-CPR可以在较低的运动强度下进行,则预期更高的抗疲劳性。由于胸部压缩被认为是稳定节奏的潜颌上体锻炼,并且由于胸部压缩的负荷单位表示为工作率,我们调查了上半身的峰值工作速率决定了运动强度的水平CCO-CPR。 12个久坐不动女(第1组),11名橄榄球运动员(r)和11名游泳运动员(组SW)进行了10分钟的CCO-CPR,并被测量了感知劳动(RPE)的心率(HR)和额定值运动强度。进行了多元线性回归分析,以评估在CCO -CPR期间使用HR和RPE在手臂曲柄运动期间记录的上体重,峰值延长力,峰值工作速率和峰值氧气吸收的潜在关系。 SE,G组和组SW组臂曲柄运动(峰值WR-AC)期间的峰值工作速率的值分别为108?±12,139?±27和146?±24瓦。后两组的值显着高于Se(r,pα<β01; Group SW,P?0.001)的价值。 CCO-CPR期间的HR随时间而增加,达到127.8〜17.6,114.8?±16.5和118.1?±14.2bpm,分别在SE,G组和组SW中的第10分钟。另一方面,CCO-CPR期间的RPE随时间而增加,达到16.4°±1.4,15.4?±1.7和13.9?±2.2组,分别在SE,G组和组SW中的第10分钟。多元线性回归分析表明,只有峰值WR-AC在CCO-CPR(HR,Rα=α - 0.458; P?<0.01; RPE,R? - 0.384,P.的峰值WR-AC影响HR和RPE两分钟?<?0.05)。 CCO-CPR期间的运动强度在上半身峰值工作速率较高的个体中较低。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号