...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physiotherapy >Group-based exercise, individually supervised exercise and home-based exercise have similar clinical effects and cost-effectiveness in people with subacromial pain: a randomised trial
【24h】

Group-based exercise, individually supervised exercise and home-based exercise have similar clinical effects and cost-effectiveness in people with subacromial pain: a randomised trial

机译:基于团体的运动,单独监督的运动和家庭运动具有类似的临床疗效和具有亚致癌的人们的成本效益:随机试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

QuestionWhat are the relative effects of group-based exercise, individual exercise and home-based exercise on clinical outcomes and costs in patients with subacromial pain?DesignMulticentre, three-arm, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation and intention-to-treat analysis.ParticipantsA total of 208 patients referred to municipal rehabilitation for management of subacromial pain in six municipalities in the Central Denmark Region.InterventionsPatients were randomly allocated to group-based exercise rehabilitation (GE), individual exercise rehabilitation (IE) or home exercise rehabilitation (HE) for a period of 8 weeks.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Quick-DASH). The secondary outcome measures included the EQ-5D-5L index, pain intensity, fear avoidance, psychological wellbeing, and the participant’s perception of improvement and satisfaction. Healthcare and productivity costs were extracted from national health and social registers.ResultsThere was no important between-group difference in Quick-DASH scores at 6 months: adjusted mean differences GE minus IE??2 (95% CI??9 to 5), GE minus HE??2 (95% CI??9 to 5) and HE minus IE 1 (95% CI??6 to 7). The estimates of the between-group differences were able to exclude any clinically important differences in the three regimens’ effects on health benefits according to the EQ-5D-5L index and other secondary outcomes. The total average costs were highest for the IE group and lowest for the HE, but not statistically different across groups.ConclusionIn people with subacromial pain, group-based exercise, individually supervised exercise and home-based supervised exercise regimens have similar benefits. The home exercise intervention was associated with lowest costs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03055117.
机译:质疑是基于组的运动,个人运动和家庭的临床结果和临床结果的相对效果以及亚致癌患者的临床结果和成本?Designmulticentre,三臂,随机对照试验,具有隐藏的分配和意向治疗分析.Participantsa 408名患者中,128名患者叙述中部丹麦中部六个城市患者沉重的沉重康复。InterventOnspatiants被随机分配给基于组的运动康复(GE),个人运动康复(即)或家庭运动康复(他) 8周的时间。衡量标准的主要结果措施是缩短版本的手臂,肩部和手动调查问卷(Quick-Dash)。二次结果措施包括EQ-5D-5L指数,疼痛强度,恐惧避免,心理健康,以及参与者对改善和满意度的看法。医疗保健和生产力成本是从国家健康和社会寄存器中提取的。乐队在6个月的速划线分数中没有重要差异:调整后的平均差异GE减去IE ?? 2(95%CI ?? 9到5),葛减去他2(95%ci ?? 9到5),他减去IE 1(95%CI ?? 6到7)。组间差异之间的估计能够根据EQ-5D-5L指数和其他二次结果排除三个方案对健康益处的任何临床重要差异。 IE组的平均成本最高,但他对他而言最低,但在群体中没有统计学不同。在亚群疼痛,基于小组的运动,单独监督运动和家庭的监督锻炼方案中的人们具有相似的福利。家庭运动干预与最低成本相关.TiaN registicalClinicTrials.gov:NCT03055117。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号