首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pain Research >Ecological Momentary Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain: Potential Pathways of Central Sensitization in Adolescents and Young Adults with and without Primary Dysmenorrhea
【24h】

Ecological Momentary Assessment of Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain: Potential Pathways of Central Sensitization in Adolescents and Young Adults with and without Primary Dysmenorrhea

机译:非月经骨盆疼痛的生态瞬间评估:青少年和患有初级痛经中的青少年和年轻成年人的潜在途径

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose:Primary dysmenorrhea (PD; menstrual pain without an identified organic cause) has been proposed as a possible risk factor for the development of chronic pelvic pain, but the mechanism through which this process occurs is unknown. One possible mechanism is central sensitization - alterations in the central nervous system that increase responsiveness to pain leading to hypersensitivity. Repeated episodes of pain, such as those experienced over time with PD, may alter how the brain processes pain. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA; collection of data in real time in participants' natural environments) is a novel data collection method that may help elucidate pain occurring during non-menstrual cycle phases.Patients and Methods:The current observational study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using EMA via text messages to collect pelvic pain data during menstrual and non-menstrual cycle phases in a community sample of adolescents and young adults (AYA) aged 16-24 years with and without PD and explored occurrence rates and intensity of non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) in each of these groups.Results:Thirty-nine AYA with PD and 53 healthy controls reported pelvic pain level via nightly text message. Global response rate was 98.5%, and all participants reported that the EMA protocol was acceptable. AYA with PD reported higher intensity (2.0 vs 1.6 on 0-10 numeric rating scale; p=0.003) and frequency (8.7% vs 3.1% of days; p=0.004) of NMPP compared to healthy controls.Conclusion:The EMA protocol was feasible and acceptable. Though both the intensity and frequency of NMPP were low and at levels that would not typically warrant clinical assessment or intervention, these repeated nociceptive events may represent a potential mechanism contributing to the transition from cyclical to chronic pelvic pain in some individuals.? 2020 Seidman et al.
机译:目的:主要痛经(PD;没有鉴定的有机原因的月经疼痛)被提出作为慢性骨盆疼痛的发育的可能性因素,但是这种过程发生的机制是未知的。一种可能的机制是中枢敏化 - 中枢神经系统的改变,增加对疼痛的反应导致过敏的疼痛。重复的疼痛发作,例如随时间经历的PD,可能会改变大脑如何处理疼痛。生态瞬间评估(EMA;在参与者的自然环境中实时收集数据)是一种新的数据收集方法,可以帮助阐明非月经周期阶段期间发生的疼痛.Patient和方法:目前的观察研究评估了可行性和可接受性通过短信使用EMA,以在16-24岁的青少年和年轻成年人(AYA)的社区样本中收集月经和非月经周期阶段的盆腔疼痛数据,并且没有PD和探索的发生率和非月经的强度这些组中的每组中的盆腔疼痛(NMPP)。结果:PD和53个健康对照组的39个Aya报告了通过每晚短信的盆腔疼痛水平。全球响应率为98.5%,所有参与者报告称EMA议定书是可接受的。具有PD的AYA报告更高的强度(0-10级值为2.0 Vs 1.6; P = 0.003)和频率(8.7%Vs 3.1%的天数; P = 0.004)NMPP与健康对照相比。结论:EMA议定书是可行和可接受的。虽然NMPP的强度和频率都低,但在通常不保证临床评估或干预的水平,但这些重复的伤害事件可能代表潜在的机制,促进了一些人在某些人中从周期性转变为慢性骨盆疼痛的潜在机制。 2020 Seidman等人。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号