...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medicine, Physiology and Biophysics >Estimation of Fetal Weight by Johnson’s Formula, Ultrasound and after Delivery
【24h】

Estimation of Fetal Weight by Johnson’s Formula, Ultrasound and after Delivery

机译:约翰逊公式,超声和交货后估算胎儿重量

获取原文

摘要

Objective : The ultimate objective of this study was to assess and validate the accuracy of fetal weight measurement by using Johnson’s formula and its comparison with fetal weight estimated by using ultrasound. Material and Method: This cross sectional study was conducted in Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahwalpur. This study took 5 months (16, January 2018 to 20, July 2019). In this trial total number of 369 pregnant mothers were included and Systematic random sampling was used for selection of mothers. First mother was selected randomly. All the data entered and analyzed by computer software SPSS 23.2. The value of P=0.005 considered to be significant. Result: A total number of 100% (n=369) women were included in this study. The mean age, parity, height and weight of the patients was 29.12±4.02 years, 2.86±1.5parity, and 149.9±3.94 cm and 51.86±3.86 kg respectively. The study population comprised of 60.4% (n=223) illiterate and 39.6% (n=146) literate women. The age distribution showed 62.3% (n=230) women between 21-30 years 37.7% (n=139) between 31-40 years. There were 54.2% (n=200) women with height 140-150 cm and 45.8% (n=169) between 151-160 cm. It was observed that there were 36% (n=133) women had weight between 40-50 kg and 64% (n=236) had weight between 51-60 kg. There were 66.1% (n=244) women had parity between 1-3 and 33.9% (n=125) had parity between 4-6.The Johnson’s formula was seen to over-estimate the fetal weight. To check the equality of means weight, one way ANOVA was applied, it was seen that all the variables i.e. Johnson’s formula, ultrasound and actual weight had the different means with significant p-value i.e. 0.000 having F-value 18.08. Conclusion : We can conclude from this study that the fetal weight estimated by Johnson’s formula is overestimated while ultrasound estimation of fetal weight always is near to actual weight after delivery.
机译:目的:本研究的最终目标是通过使用Johnson的公式及其与使用超声估计的胎儿重量的比较来评估和验证胎儿重量测量的准确性。材料和方法:这项横断面研究是在妇产科,巴拉瓦维多利亚医院巴瓦尔普尔进行。这项研究花了5个月(2018年7月16日至20日)。在此试验中,包括369名怀孕母亲的总数,并使用系统的随机抽样来选择母亲。第一个母亲随机选择。通过计算机软件SPSS 23.2输入和分析的所有数据。 P = 0.005的值被认为是显着的。结果:本研究中包含100%(n = 369)妇女的总数。患者的平均年龄,奇偶阶段,身高和体重分别为29.12±4.02岁,2.86±1.5parity分别为149.9±3.94厘米和51.86±3.86千克。该研究人口包含60.4%(n = 223)文盲,39.6%(n = 146)哲学妇女。年龄分布显示62.3%(n = 230)妇女在31-40岁之间21-30岁(n = 139)之间。有54.2%(n = 200)款女性,高度为140-150厘米,45.8%(n = 169),在151-160厘米之间。观察到有36%(n = 133)族的体重在40-50kg之间,64%(n = 236)重量在51-60 kg之间。有66.1%(n = 244)女性在1-3和33.9%之间的平等(n = 125)在4-6之间的平等。约翰逊的公式被视为过度估计胎儿体重。为了检查均值的平等,应用了一种方式,看来,可以看出,所有变量,即约翰逊的公式,超声和实际权重具有不同的平均值,具有显着的p值I.0.000,具有F值18.08。结论:我们可以从这项研究中得出结论,约翰逊公式估计的胎儿重量高估,同时胎儿重量的超声估计始终靠近实际重量。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号