...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Agricultural Science >Effects of Enhanced-Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers on Soil Microbial Biomass and Respiration in Tropical Soil Under Upland Rice Cultivation
【24h】

Effects of Enhanced-Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers on Soil Microbial Biomass and Respiration in Tropical Soil Under Upland Rice Cultivation

机译:增强效率氮肥对旱稻栽培土壤微生物生物质和呼吸的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While over-use of N fertilizers can suppress microbial biomass, application of urease inhibitors is known to be a potential way to rebuilt microbial diversity and improve soil functions.However, the hypothesis of this study is that the application of N fertilizers regardless of the source would increase soil microbial biomass and reduce soil respiration.A two-year field experiment was conducted to assess the effects of enhanced-efficiency N sources on soil microbial biomass, and soil respiration.The experiment was set up in a randomized block design in a 3 × 4 + 1 factorial scheme, with four replicates.Treatments comprised three sources (conventional uncoated urea, NBPT (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide)-treated urea, and polymer-coated urea) and four rates (30, 60, 90 and 120 kg ha-1) of N, in addition to a control treatment (no fertilizer application).Microbial biomass C (MBC) and microbial biomass N (MBN), and soil respiration (C-CO2 and qCO2) were determined in upland rice rhizosphere in each crop season.Responses of soil microbial properties to N fertilization were dependent on the N rates, but no significant effect of the N sources was observed.All measured parameters, except MBC in the first season and C-CO2 in the second season, were increased with increasing N rates.However, the application of N higher than 60 kg ha-1 suppressed soil microbial biomass, as well as soil respiration. Therefore, the lack of response by added urease inhibitors to the N sources indicate that optimizing N rates for upland rice production is a far more effective option for improving soil microbial community than using enhanced-efficiency N sources.
机译:虽然N型肥料的过度使用可以抑制微生物生物量,但已知应用脲酶抑制剂是重建微生物多样性的潜在方法,并改善土壤功能。然而,该研究的假设是,不论源的应用如何施用n肥料将增加土壤微生物的生物量,减少土壤呼吸。进行两年的田间实验,以评估增强效率N源对土壤微生物的影响和土壤呼吸的影响。在3中的三个随机块设计中建立了实验×4 + 1个因子方案,四个重复。加法包含三种来源(常规未涂覆的尿素,Nbpt(N-丁基)硫代磷三胺) - 处理尿素和聚合物涂覆的尿素)和四个速率(30,60,60, N和120 kg HA-1)除了对照处理(无施用)。霉菌生物量C(MBC)和微生物生物量N(MBN)和土壤呼吸(C-CO2和QCO2)之外旱稻rhizo.每个作物季节的球体。土壤微生物特性的批量依赖于n率,但没有观察到n个来源的显着效果。在第一季的MBC和第二季的C-CO2之外没有测量的参数。 ,随着N的增加而增加。但是,N高于60kg HA-1抑制土壤微生物量的N高,以及土壤呼吸。因此,向N个源的添加脲酶抑制剂缺乏响应表明,优化隆水稻生产的N率是改善土壤微生物群落的更有效的选择,而不是使用增强效率N来源。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号