首页> 外文期刊>Journal of King Saud University >Mode of application of acaricides against the ectoparasitic mite ( Varroa destructor) infesting honeybee colonies, determines their efficiencies and residues in honey and beeswax
【24h】

Mode of application of acaricides against the ectoparasitic mite ( Varroa destructor) infesting honeybee colonies, determines their efficiencies and residues in honey and beeswax

机译:杀螨剂对异肝螨的施用方式( varroa析构函数)侵染蜜蜂菌落,决定了蜂蜜和蜂蜡中的效率和残留物

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives:Ensuring adequate treatments for acaricide efficacy to combat mite infestation is a pre-requisite for healthy honeybees and a good yield of hive products. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the effect of the mode of application on efficiency of two acaricides; Vapcozin-20 (amitraz) and Mavrik 2F (fluvalinate) againstVarroamite infesting brood and adult honeybees.Methods:To do so, we used 21 honeybee colonies (3 colony per treatment) between December 2018 and March 2019. Varroacides were applied by three different methods: cotton strips (impregnated in each tested acaricide solution for 24?h) or direct spraying (5?mL for each colony) or using carton paper (impregnated in each tested acaricide solution for 5?min) then put directly on the top of brood combs. All treatments were applied twice at a month interval. We also quantified acaricides residues in honey and beeswax after 1, 15, 30, 60 and 90?days of acaricides treatment.Results:The different application methods of both acaricides againstV. destructorshowed relatively similar efficiencies in both brood and adult honeybees that ranged from 93.8 to 100% for Mavrik 2F and from 83.75 to 96.37% for Vapcozin with no significant differences between different application methods. Fluvalinate residues detected in both honey and wax collected from colonies treated with the strips method, exceeded the maximum residue limits (0.05?ppm for both honey and wax) according to EU Pesticides database. While amitraz residues were not detected in any colonies treated with Vapcozin-20 after 3?months of treatment, regardless of the application method.Conclusions:The three different methods of application of Mavrik 2F and Vapcozin-20 showed great efficiency for the control ofVarroamite, however the application of both miticides using carton paper method was the most appropriate because it showed very minimal acaricides residues.
机译:目的:确保对抗螨虫的杀螨剂疗效的适当治疗是健康蜜蜂的前提条件和蜂巢产品的良好产量。因此,本研究旨在评估应用方式对两种亚杀螨剂效率的影响; Vapcozin-20(Amitraz)和Mavrik 2F(Fluvalinate)反对Varroamite侵扰育房和成人蜜蜂。此外,我们在2018年12月和2019年3月期间使用了21次蜜蜂殖民地(每次治疗3个殖民地)。瓦罗酰丙酰基由三种不同的方法应用:棉条(浸渍在每次测试的杀螨剂溶液24℃)或直接喷涂(每个菌落5?ml)或使用纸箱纸(在每个测试的杀螨剂溶液中浸渍5?min),然后直接放在巢穴顶部梳子。所有治疗均在一个月间隔施用两次。在1,15,30,60和90-酮的杀螨剂治疗后,我们还量化了蜂蜜和蜂蜜中的杀螨剂残留物。结果:缩小剂的不同施用方法。损伤讲道在培养和成人蜜蜂中的效率相对相似,可在Mavrik 2F的93.8%到100%,vapcozin的83.75至96.37%,不同的应用方法之间没有显着差异。根据欧盟农药数据库,在从用条带法处理的菌落收集的蜂窝中检测到的蜂窝和蜡中检测到从用条带法处理的菌落收集的蜡,超过最大残留物限制(蜂蜜和蜡的0.05〜ppm)。虽然在3个月治疗后,在治疗后的vapcozin-20治疗的任何菌落中未检测到amitraz残留物,但无论应用方法如何。链接:Mavrik 2F和Vapcozin-20的三种不同的应用方法对varroamite的控制表现出了巨大的效率,然而,两种杀螨剂使用纸箱纸方法的应用是最合适的,因为它显示出非常少的杀螨剂残留物。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号