首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Eating Disorders >Patient descriptions of loss of control and eating episode size interact to influence expert diagnosis of ICD-11 binge-eating disorder
【24h】

Patient descriptions of loss of control and eating episode size interact to influence expert diagnosis of ICD-11 binge-eating disorder

机译:患者对丧失控制和食用情节尺寸的描述相互作用,以影响ICD-11狂犬病疾病的专家诊断

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background Although data suggest that the sense of “loss of control” (LOC) is the most salient aspect of binge eating, the definition of LOC varies widely across eating disorder assessments. The WHO ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines for binge eating do not require an objectively large amount of food, which makes accurate LOC diagnosis even more critical. However, it can be especially challenging to assess LOC in the context of elevated weight status and in the absence of compensatory behaviors. This ICD-11 field sub-study examined how descriptions of subjective experience during distressing eating episodes, in combination with different eating episode sizes, influence diagnoses of binge-eating disorder (BED). Method Mental health professionals with eating disorder expertise from WHO’s Global Clinical Practice Network ( N =?192) participated in English, Japanese, and Spanish. Participants were asked to select the correct diagnosis for two randomly assigned case vignettes and to rate the clinical importance and ease of use of each BED diagnostic guideline. Results The presence of LOC interacted with episode size to predict whether a correct diagnostic conclusion was reached. If the amount consumed during a typical distressing eating episode was only subjectively large compared to objectively large, clinicians were 23.1 times more likely to miss BED than to correctly diagnose it, and they were 9.7 times more likely to incorrectly diagnose something else than to correctly diagnose BED. In addition, clinicians were 10.8 times more likely to make a false positive diagnosis of BED when no LOC was described if the episode was objectively large. Descriptions of LOC that were reliably associated with correct diagnoses across episodes sizes included two that are similar to those already included in proposed ICD-11 guidelines and a third that is not. This third description of LOC focuses on giving up attempts to control eating because perceived overeating feels inevitable. Conclusions Results highlight the importance of detailed clarification of the LOC construct in future guidelines. Explicitly distinguishing LOC from distressing and mindless overeating could help promote consistent and accurate diagnosis of BED versus another or no eating disorder.
机译:抽象背景虽然数据表明“控制丧失”(LOC)是狂欢进食的最突出的方面,但LOC的定义随着饮食障碍评估而广泛变化。 WHO ICD-11用于狂暴进食的诊断指南不需要客观大量的食物,这使得精确的LOC诊断更为关键。然而,在升高的体重状态和不存在补偿行为的情况下评估LOC可能尤其具有挑战性。该ICD-11现场研究检测了如何在令人痛苦的饮食中描述主观经验的描述,同时与不同的进食发作大小相结合,影响狂犬病疾病(床)的诊断。方法精神卫生专业人员与饮食失调专业知识从世卫组织的全球临床实践网络(n =?192)参加英语,日语和西班牙语。要求参与者选择两种随机分配的案例雕刻件的正确诊断,并对每张床诊断指南进行临床重要性和易用性。结果LOC的存在与情节尺寸相互作用,以预测是否达到了正确的诊断结论。如果在典型的令人痛苦的饮食中消耗的金额相比,与客观大的情况相比,临床医生可能比正确诊断睡眠的可能性比较大,临床医生可能比正确诊断更容易诊断出其他东西,而不是正确诊断床。此外,如果没有LOC,则临床医生可能在没有LOC时,在没有LOC的情况下造型较大时,患有错误阳性诊断的可能性。与跨剧集尺寸的正确诊断可靠地相关联的LOC的描述包括两个类似于已经包括在所提出的ICD-11指南和第三个的那些。第三个关于LOC的描述重点是放弃控制饮食的尝试,因为感知暴饮暴食是不可避免的。结论结果突显了在未来的指导方针中详细澄清LOC构建的重要性。显式区分LOC免受痛苦和无意识的暴饮暴食可以帮助促进一致和准确的床与另一个或没有饮食失调的诊断。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号