首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Evaluation of indirect pulp capping using pozzolan-based cement (ENDOCEM-Zr?) and mineral trioxide aggregate - A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Evaluation of indirect pulp capping using pozzolan-based cement (ENDOCEM-Zr?) and mineral trioxide aggregate - A randomized controlled trial

机译:基于Pozzolan的水泥(Endocem-Zrα)和矿物三氧化物聚集体的间接纸浆覆盖物评价 - 随机对照试验

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Pulp capping should always be considered as the primary treatment of choice for teeth without irreversible pulpitis in lesions approaching dental pulp. The predictability of vital pulp therapy has improved with the introduction of newer bioceramic materials. Aim: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the outcomes of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) and a pozzolan-based cement (ENDOCEM-Zr ? [Maruchi, Wonju, Korea]) as an indirect pulp capping (IPC) material. Materials and Methods: IPC was performed in forty patients who were randomly divided into ENDOCEM-Zr ? and MTA groups. The outcome was assessed using clinical and radiographic tests at different time intervals. The prognostic factors on the outcome of IPC were also evaluated. Results and Conclusions: The success rate of ENDOCEM-Zr ? and MTA groups was 94.7% and 89.4%, respectively. The results were not statistically significant. Binary logical regression showed that the age of the patient and the status of the pulp before treatment were deciding variables for the outcome of the study. Therefore, it was concluded from the study that the evaluated pozzolan-based cement could be used as an alternative to MTA because of its faster setting time and lower discoloration potential. In addition, pulp capping should be performed with caution in individuals above 40 years and in teeth with reversible pulpitis.
机译:背景:纸浆封端应始终被认为是牙齿在没有不可逆牙髓炎的牙齿牙齿的主要治疗方法。随着较新的生物陶瓷材料的推出,重要纸浆治疗的可预测性得到了改善。目的:这种随机对照试验的目的是比较矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)(Angelus,Londrina,Brazil)和基于火山灰水泥的结果(Endocem-Zr?[Maruchi,Wonju,韩国])作为间接纸浆盖(IPC)材料。材料和方法:IPC在四十名患者中进行,随机分为Endocem-Zr?和MTA组。使用不同时间间隔使用临床和放射线检查进行评估结果。还评估了IPC结果的预后因素。结果与结论:Endocem-Zr的成功率? MTA组分别为94.7%和89.4%。结果没有统计学意义。二进制逻辑回归显示患者的年龄和纸浆的状态在治疗前决定了该研究结果的变量。因此,由于其更快的设定时间和更低的变色电位,从研究中得出评估的基于Pozzolan基水泥作为MTA的替代方法。此外,纸浆封端应小心在40岁以上的个体和具有可逆牙髓炎的牙齿上进行。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号