...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review
【24h】

Evaluation of Success Rate of Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair Compared to Vitapex in Pulpally Involved Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review

机译:对病变灭菌和组织修复成功率的评估与脉动涉及的初级齿相比Vitapex:系统评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Vitapex has been a popular obturating material for several decades. In recent times, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) has shown promising results. This technique uses a mixture of 3 antibiotics for sterilization of the root canals and healing of periradicular tissues. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to compile all the literature comparing Vitapex and LSTR for pulpally involved primary teeth and evaluate the success rate in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Materials and Methods: This review is based on PRISMA guidelines. The electronic search on MEDLINE via PubMed database and Google scholar, cross-referencing and hand search of journals was carried out for articles from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Articles only in the English language were selected. Out of the 17 articles, 3 unique articles were identified for the review, of which 2 were randomized controlled trials and 1 was a retrospective study. Results: All the three articles were assessed for their quality and all had a low risk of bias. It was found that LSTR and Vitapex had a high clinical success after 12 months. The radiographic success after 6 months was high but decreased after 12 months in both the groups. Conclusion: There is no difference in the success rate of LSTR as compared to Vitapex for the treatment of pulpally involved primary teeth.
机译:背景:Vitapex已成为几十年的流行闷热材料。最近,病变灭菌和组织修复(LSTR)显示了有希望的结果。该技术使用3种抗生素的混合物用于灭菌根系管道和肝癌的愈合。目的:该系统审查的目的是编制所有文献,比较Vitapex和Lstr用于突出的初级牙齿,并评估临床和放射线检查结果的成功率。材料和方法:本评价基于Prisma指南。通过PubMed数据库和Google学者的电子搜索通过PubMed数据库和谷歌学者,在2019年1月1日至2019年12月31日的文章下进行了交叉引用和手中搜索期刊。仅选中英语的文章。在17篇文章中,确定了3条独特的文章进行了审查,其中2个是随机对照试验,1是回顾性研究。结果:所有三篇文章都被评估了它们的质量,所有这些文章都具有低偏倚风险。发现LSTR和VITAPEX在12个月后临床成功高。 6个月后的射线照相成功很高,但在两组中12个月后减少。结论:与Vitapex治疗原发性牙齿的Vitapex相比,LSTR的成功率没有差异。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号