首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer >Outcomes of Adjuvant Oral versus Intravenous Fluoropyrimidines for High-Risk Stage II or Stage III Colon Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study
【24h】

Outcomes of Adjuvant Oral versus Intravenous Fluoropyrimidines for High-Risk Stage II or Stage III Colon Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study

机译:佐剂口服的结果与静脉内氟嘧啶高风险阶段II或阶段III结肠腺癌:倾向分数匹配,全国范围,基于人口的群组研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: We conducted this propensity score (PS)-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate the effects of adjuvant oral or intravenous (IV) fluoropyrimidine in patients with high-risk stage II or III colon adenocarcinoma. Design: Using PS matching, we minimized the confounding effects on adjuvant oral or IV fluoropyrimidine outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II or III resectable colon adenocarcinoma. Setting: We selected patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine monotherapy and divided them into those receiving IV fluoropyrimidine (IV group) and those receiving oral fluoropyrimidine (oral group). Results: In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) derived for the oral group was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.19-1.51) compared with the IV group. Moreover, in both univariate and multivariate analyses, aHR derived for significant independent prognostic risk factors for poor overall survival were male sex, age ≥ 60 years old, pathologic stage III, right-sided colon cancer, low income, and high Charlson comorbidity index. However, intergroup differences were not significant among female patients or patients 60 years old on multivariate analysis, including no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Adjuvant IV fluoropyrimidine is more suitable than adjuvant oral fluoropyrimidine for patients with stage II colon adenocarcinoma who have high-risk pathologic features or stage III colon adenocarcinoma.? The author(s).
机译:目的:我们进行了这一倾向评分(PS) - 全国,基于人口的群组研究,以估算辅助口服或静脉内(IV)氟哌啶胺对高风险阶段II或III结肠腺癌患者的影响。设计:使用PS匹配,最小化高风险阶段II或III可转型结肠腺癌患者的佐剂口腔或IV氟嘧啶结果的混淆效应。设置:我们选择从台湾癌症注册表数据库接受佐剂氟嘧啶单疗法,并将其分成接受IV氟嘧啶(IV组)的那些,以及接受口服氟嘧啶(口服)的那些。结果:在单变量和多变量COX回归分析中,与IV组相比,对口服组的调整后危害比(AHR)为1.34(95%CI:1.19-1.51)。此外,在单变量和多变量分析中,对于贫困整体生存率的显着独立预后危险因素来说,AHR衍生出对贫瘠的全身生存率是男性性交,年龄≥60岁,病理阶段III,右侧结肠癌,低收入和高的Charlson合并症指数。然而,在多元分析中女性患者或60岁的患者中杂项差异并不重要,包括整体生存率没有差异。结论:佐剂IV氟嘧啶比辅助口服氟嘧啶更适合于患有高危病理特征或III阶段结肠腺癌的阶段结肠腺癌患者的辅助口服氟嘧啶。作者。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号