首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer >Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study
【24h】

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

机译:可以组合超声波和弹性摄影的筛选改善乳腺癌鉴定与密集乳房的女性MRI相比 - 多中心前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: To assess the performance of elastography (ES) and ultrasound (US) in predicting the malignancy of breast lesions and to compare their combined diagnostic value with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: The study prospectively enrolled 242 female patients with dense breasts treated in 35 heath care facilities in China between November 2018 and October 2019. Based on conventional US and elastography, radiologists classified the degree of suspicion of breast lesions according to the US Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) criteria. The diagnostic value was compared between US BI-RADS and MRI BI-RADS, with pathological results used as the reference standard. Results: The results demonstrated that irregular tumor shape, a nonparallel growth orientation, indistinct margins, angular contours, microcalcifications, color Doppler flow and ES score on US imaging were significantly related to breast cancer in dense breasts (P=0.001; P=0.001; P=0.008; P0.001; P=0.019; P=0.008; P=0.002, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and AUC of US BI-RADS category were 94.7%, 90.7%, 95.8%, 88.0%, 93.4% and 0.93 (95%CI, 0.88-0.97), respectively, while those of MRI BI-RADS category were 98.2%, 57.5%, 84.3%, 83.3%, 86.0% and 0.78 (95%CI, 0.71-0.85), respectively. MRI BI-RADS showed a significantly higher sensitivity than US BI-RADS (98.2% vs 94.7%, P=0.043), whereas US BI-RADS showed significantly higher specificity (90.7% vs 57.5%, P0.001). US BI-RADS showed better diagnostic efficiency in differentiating nodules in dense breasts than MRI BI-RADS (AUC 0.93 vs 0.78, P0.001). Conclusion: By combining the use of ES and conventional US, US BI-RADS had better diagnostic efficiency in differentiating nodules in dense breasts than MRI. For the diagnosis of malignant tumors in patients with dense breasts, MRI and US BI-RADS can be used as supplemental diagnostic tools to detect lesions, with US BI-RADS considered the preferred adjunctive resource.? The author(s).
机译:目的:评估弹性摄影和超声(US)预测乳腺病变恶性肿瘤的性能,并将其与磁共振成像(MRI)的组合诊断值进行比较。材料与方法:2018年11月和2019年11月在中国35家Heath Care设施中预期的242例女性患者致密乳房治疗。基于常规美国和弹性造影,放射科医师根据美国乳房归类乳腺病变的怀疑程度成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)标准。在US Bi-Rads和MRI Bi-rad之间比较诊断值,病理结果用作参考标准。结果:结果表明,肿瘤形状不规则,非平行增长,模糊余量,角轮廓,微钙化,彩色多普勒流量和美国成像的es得分与致密乳房的乳腺癌显着相关(P = 0.001; P = 0.001; p = 0.008; p <0.001; p = 0.019; p = 0.008; p = 0.002分别)。美国Bi-rads类别的敏感性,特异性,PPV,NPV,精度和AUC分别为94.7%,90.7%,95.8%,88.0%,93.4%和0.93(95%CI,0.88-0.97),而那些MRI Bi-Rads类别分别为98.2%,57.5%,84.3%,83.3%,86.0%和0.78(95%CI,0.71-0.85)。 MRI BI-RAD显示比美国BI-RAD的敏感性显着更高(98.2%vs 94.7%,P = 0.043),而美国BI-RAD呈显着更高的特异性(90.7%Vs 57.5%,P <0.001)。美国Bi-rad展示比MRI Bi-rad(AUC 0.93 Vs 0.78,P <0.001)的致密乳房中的结节鉴定更好的诊断效率。结论:通过结合ES和常规US的使用,US BI-RAD在将结节中的结节与MRI分化时具有更好的诊断效率。对于致密乳房患者的恶性肿瘤的诊断,MRI和US BI-RAD可以用作检测病变的补充诊断工具,美国BI-RAD认为是首选的辅助资源。作者。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号