首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery >Preoperative identification of clinicopathological prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single center-based study
【24h】

Preoperative identification of clinicopathological prognostic factors for relapse-free survival in clinical N1 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective single center-based study

机译:临床病理学预后因子术前鉴定临床N1非小细胞肺癌中复发存活的临床病理预后因素:一种回顾性单中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Given the difficulty in preoperatively diagnosing lymph node metastasis, patients with Stage I–III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are likely to be included in the clinical N1 (cN1) group. However, better treatment options might be selected through further stratification. This study aimed to identify preoperative clinicopathological prognostic and stratification factors for patients with cN1 NSCLC. This retrospective study evaluated 60 patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC during 2004–2014. Clinical nodal status had been evaluated using routine chest computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET). To avoid biasing the fluorodeoxyglucose uptake values based on inter-institution or inter-model differences, we used only two PET systems (one PET system and one PET/CT system). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary study outcomes. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was calculated for each tumor and categorized as low or high based on the median value. Patient sex, age, histology, tumor size, and tumor markers were also assessed. Poor OS was associated with older age (P?=?0.0159) and high SUVmax values (P?=?0.0142). Poor RFS was associated with positive carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression (P?=?0.0035) and high SUVmax values (P?=?0.015). Multivariate analyses confirmed that poor OS was independently predicted by older age (hazard ratio [HR]?=?2.751, confidence interval [CI]: 1.300–5.822; P?=?0.0081) and high SUVmax values (HR?=?5.121, 95% CI: 1.759–14.910; P?=?0.0027). Furthermore, poor RFS was independently predicted by positive CEA expression (HR?=?2.376, 95% CI: 1.056–5.348; P?=?0.0366) and high SUVmax values (HR?=?2.789, 95% CI: 1.042–7.458; P?=?0.0410). The primary tumor’s SUVmax value was also an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. For patients with cN1 NSCLC, preoperative prognosis and stratification might be performed based on CEA expression, age, and the primary tumor’s SUVmax value. To enhance the prognostic value of the primary tumor’s SUVmax value, minimizing bias between facilities and models could lead to a more accurate prognostication.
机译:鉴于术前淋巴结转移诊断,患者具有阶段I-III的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)可能被包括在临床N1(CN1)组中的困难。然而,更好的治疗选择可能是通过进一步分层进行选择。本研究旨在确定患者CN1非小细胞肺癌术前临床预后和分层因素。该项研究评估了谁2004 - 2014年期间被诊断患有非小细胞肺癌患者60例。临床淋巴结状态一直使用常规胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)和/或正电子发射断层扫描(PET)来评价。为了避免偏置基于跨校或模型间的差异的氟脱氧摄取值,我们仅使用两个PET系统(一个PET系统和一个PET / CT系统)。无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存期(OS)是主要的研究成果。标准化摄取值(SUVmax值)的最大计算每个肿瘤以及基于所述中间值分类为低或高。患者性别,年龄,组织学,肿瘤大小,肿瘤标志物也进行了评估。可怜的OS与年龄较大(P?=?0.0159)和高SUVmax的值(P?=?0.0142)相关。差RFS用阳性癌胚抗原(CEA)的表达(P =?0.0035)和高SUVmax的值(P = 0.015)相关联。多元分析证实,OS差被独立地由年龄预测?(危险比(HR)= 2.751,置信区间[CI]:????1.300-5.822; P = 0.0081)和高SUVmax的值(HR = 5.121, 95%CI:?1.759-14.910; P = 0.0027)。此外,不良的RFS被独立地由正CEA表达预测?(HR = 2.376,95%CI:????1.056-5.348; P = 0.0366)和高SUVmax的值(HR = 2.789,95%CI:1.042-7.458 ; P = 0.0410)?。原发肿瘤的SUVmax的值也为两个OS和RFS的独立预后因素。对于患者CN1非小细胞肺癌,术前预后和分层可能基于CEA表达,年龄和原发肿瘤的SUVmax的值来进行。为了提高原发肿瘤的SUVmax值值的预测价值,最大限度地降低设备和模型之间的偏差可能导致更准确的预测。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号