...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery >Clinical outcomes of acute pulmonary embolectomy as the first-line treatment for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: a single-centre study in China
【24h】

Clinical outcomes of acute pulmonary embolectomy as the first-line treatment for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: a single-centre study in China

机译:急性肺栓塞术的临床结果作为大规模肺栓塞第一线治疗:中国单一中心研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the most critical cardiovascular diseases. PE treatment ranges from anticoagulation, and systemic thrombolysis to surgical embolectomy and catheter embolectomy. Surgical pulmonary embolectmy (SPE) indications and outcomes are still controversial. Although there have been more favourable SPE reports over the past decades, SPE has not yet been considered broadly as an initial PE therapy and is still considered as a reserve or rescue treatment for acute massive PE when systemic thrombolysis fails. This study aimed to evaluate the early and midterm outcomes of SPE, which was a first-line therapy for acute central major PE in one Chinese single centre. A retrospective review of patients who underwent SPE for acute PE was conducted.Patients with chronic thrombus or who underwent thromboendarterectomy were excluded. SPE risk factors for morbidity and mortality were reviewed, and echocardiographic examination were conducted for follow-up studies to access right ventricular function. Overall, 41 patients were included; 17 (41.5%) had submassive PE, and 24 (58.5%) had massive PE. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 103.2?±?48.9?min, and 10 patients (24.4%) underwent procedures without aortic cross-clamping. Ventilatory support time was 78?h (range, 40–336?h), intensive care unit stay was 7?days (range, 3–13?days), and hospital stay was 16?days (range, 12–23?days). Operative mortalities occurred in 3 massive PE patients, and no mortality occurred in submassive PE patients. The overall SPE mortality rate was 7.31% (3/41). If two systemic thrombolysis cases were excluded, SPE mortality was low (2.56%,1/39), evenlthough there were 2 cases of cardiac arrest preoperatively. Patients’ right ventricle function improved postoperatively in follow-ups.There were no deaths related to recurrent PE and chronic pulmonary hypertension in follow-ups, though 3 patients died of cerebral intracranial bleeding, gastric cancer,and brain cancer at 1?year, 3?years, and 8?years postoperatively, respectively. SPE presented with a low mortality rate when rendered as a first-line treatment in selected massive and submassive acute PE patients. Favorable outcomes of right ventricle function were also observed in the follow-ups. SPE should play the same role as ST in algorithmic acute PE treatment.
机译:急性肺栓塞(PE)是最关键的心血管疾病之一。 PE治疗从抗凝范围和全身溶栓手术取栓和导管取栓。外科肺embolectmy(SPE)的适应症和结果仍有争议。虽然已经有在过去几十年更有利的SPE报道,SPE还没有被广泛视为初始PE治疗,当全身溶栓失败仍被视为储备或抢救治疗急性大面积PE。这项研究的目的是评估SPE,这是在一个中国的单中心急性中央重大PE一线治疗的早期和中期的结果。谁的病人急性PE例行SPE是慢性血栓或谁接受血栓被排除conducted.Patients回顾性分析。对发病率和死亡率SPE的风险因素进行了审查,并超声心动图检查是为后续研究进行访问右心室功能。总体而言,41例患者; 17(41.5%)有PE次大面积,和24(58.5%)有大量的PE。平均体外循环时间为103.2?±?48.9?分钟,和10例(24.4%),而不阻断主动脉后行程序。通气支持时间为78?H(范围,40-336?h)时,重症监护病房住院时间7?天(范围,3-13?天),住院时间为16?天(范围12-23?天)。手术发生死亡3名大块肺栓塞患者,以及发生在PE次大面积患者无死亡病例。整体SPE死亡率为7.31%(3/41)。如果两个全身溶栓案件被排除在外,SPE死亡率较低(2.56%,1/39),evenlthough有2例心脏骤停的术前。患者的右心室功能在后续ups.There术后改善没有相关的后续行动PE复发和慢性肺动脉高压死亡,但死亡3例脑颅内出血等,胃癌和脑癌的1?一年,3 ?年,8年半术后,分别。 SPE呈现时在选择大规模和急性次大面积PE患者的第一线治疗呈现的低死亡率。右心室功能的有利结果在随访中也观察到。 SPE应该在算法急性肺栓塞的治疗发挥ST相同的作用。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号