首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle >Efficacy of multidomain interventions to improve physical frailty, depression and cognition: data from cluster‐randomized controlled trials
【24h】

Efficacy of multidomain interventions to improve physical frailty, depression and cognition: data from cluster‐randomized controlled trials

机译:多畴干预改善身体脆弱,抑郁和认知的功效:来自集群随机对照试验的数据

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Frailty is the pre‐eminent exigency of aging. Although frailty‐related impairments are preventable, and multidomain interventions appear more effective than unimodal ones, the optimal components remain uncertain. Methods We devised multidomain interventions against physical and cognitive decline among prefrail/frail community‐dwelling ≥65‐year‐olds and evaluated these in complementary cluster‐randomized trials of efficacy and participant empowerment. The Efficacy Study compared ~3‐monthly telephone consultations vs. 16, 2 h sessions/year comprising communally partaken physical and cognitive training plus nutrition and disease education; the Empowerment Study compared the standard Efficacy Study multidomain intervention (Sessions 1–10) vs. an enhanced version redesigned to empower and motivate individual participants. Changes from baseline in physical, functional, and cognitive performance were measured after 6 and 12 months in the Efficacy Study and after 6 months in the Empowerment Study, with post‐intervention follow‐up at 9 months. Primary outcomes are as follows: Cardiovascular Health Study frailty score; gait speed; handgrip strength; and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes are as follows: instrumental activities of daily living; metabolic equivalent of task (MET); depressed mood (Geriatric Depression Scale‐5 ≥2); and malnutrition (Mini‐Nutritional Assessment short‐form ≤11). Intervention effects were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model. Results Efficacy Study participants (n = 1082, 40 clusters) were 75.1 ± 6.3 years old, 68.7% women, and 64.7% prefrail/frail; analytic clusters: 19 intervention (410/549 completed) vs. 21 control (375/533 completed). Empowerment Study participants (n = 440, 14 clusters) were 75.9 ± 7.1 years old, 83.6% women, and 56.7% prefrail/frail; analytic clusters: seven intervention (209/230 completed) vs. seven control (189/210 completed). The standard and enhanced multidomain interventions both reduced frailty and significantly improved aspects of physical, functional, and cognitive performance, especially among ≥75‐year‐olds. Standard multidomain intervention decreased depression [odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32, 0.99] and malnutrition (odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.26, 0.78) by 12 months and improved concentration at Months 6 (0.23, 95% CI 0.04, 0.42) and 12 (0.46, 95% CI 0.22, 0.70). Participant empowerment augmented activity (4.67 MET/h, 95% CI 1.64, 7.69) and gait speed (0.06 m/s, 95% CI 0.00, 0.11) at 6 months, with sustained improvements in delayed recall (0.63, 95% CI 0.20, 1.06) and MoCA performance (1.29, 95% CI 0.54, 2.03), and less prevalent malnutrition (odds ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.18, 0.84), 3 months after the intervention ceased. Conclusions Pragmatic multidomain intervention can diminish physical frailty, malnutrition, and depression and enhance cognitive performance among community‐dwelling elders, especially ≥75‐year‐olds; this might supplement healthy aging policies, probably more effectively if participants are empowered.
机译:背景脆弱是衰老的卓越征服。虽然可预防脆弱的损伤,但多粉末干预似乎比单向性更有效,但最佳组件仍然不确定。方法采用多群体干预措施,防止预制/虚弱社区居住≥65岁的身体和认知下降,并评估这些互补性和参与者赋权的互补群体随机试验。疗效研究比较〜3月的电话咨询与16,2小时,2小时课程/年度,包括社会党的身体和认知培训加营养和疾病教育;赋权研究比较了标准疗效研究多群体干预(会议1-10)与增强版本重新设计并激励各个参与者。在疗效研究的6个月和赋权研究中6个月后,测量来自物理,功能和认知性能的基线的变化,并在赋权研究6个月后,在9个月内进行干预后随访。主要结果如下:心血管健康研究脆弱得分;步态速度;手工强度;和蒙特利尔认知评估(MOCA)。二次结果如下:日常生活的工具活动;代谢相当于任务(达到);情绪沮丧(老年抑郁尺寸-5≥2);和营养不良(迷你营养评估短片≤11)。使用广义的线性混合模型分析干预效果。结果效力研究参与者(n = 1082,40群集)为75.1±6.3岁,女性68.7%和64.7%预制/脆弱;分析集群:19干预(410/549完成)与21(375/533完成)。赋权研究参与者(n = 440,14个集群)为75.9±7.1岁,女性83.6%,预制/脆弱56.7%;分析集群:七种干预(209/230竣工)与七次控制(189/210完成)。标准和增强的多麦田干预均减少了体外,功能性和认知性能的脆弱性和显着改善的方面,特别是≥75岁。标准多群干预减少抑郁症[差距0.56,95%置信区间(CI)0.32,0.99]和营养不良(差距为0.45,95%CI 0.26,0.78),在6个月内提高浓度(0.23,95%CI 0.04,0.42)和12(0.46,95%CI 0.22,0.70)。参与者赋予增强活动(4.67 MET / H,95%CI 1.64,7.69)和步态速度(0.06米/秒,95%CI 0.00,0.11),延迟召回持续改善(0.63,95%CI 0.20 ,1.06)和MOCA性能(1.29,95%CI 0.54,2.03),较少普遍的营养不良(赔率比0.39,95%CI 0.18,0.84),停止3个月后。结论务实的多群体干预可以减少身体脆弱,营养不良和抑郁症,并提高社区居住长老,特别是≥75岁的认知表现;这可能会补充健康的老化政策,如果参与者有权更有效地更有效。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号