首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied clinical medical physics / >Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation
【24h】

Physician review of image registration and normal structure delineation

机译:ImageIsian图像登记和正常结构描绘综述

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Image registration and delineation of organs at risk (OARs) are key components of three‐dimensional conformal (3DCRT) and intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning. This study hypothesized that image registration and OAR delineation are often performed by medical physicists and/or dosimetrists and are not routinely reviewed by treating physicians. Methods An anonymous, internet‐based survey of medical physicists and dosimetrists was distributed via the MEDPHYS and MEDDOS listserv groups. Participants were asked to characterize standard practices for completion and review of OAR contouring, target volume contouring, and image registration at their institution along with their personal training in these areas and level of comfort performing these tasks. Likert‐type scales are reported as Median [Interquartile range] with scores ranging from 1?=?“Extremely/All of the time” to 5?=?“Not at all/Never.” Results Two hundred and ninety‐seven individuals responded to the survey. Overall, respondents indicated significantly less frequent physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3]), and less confidence in the thoroughness of physician review (3 [2–4] vs 2 [1–3], P ?0.01) of OAR contours compared to image registration. Only 19% (95% CI 14–24%) of respondents reported a formal process by which OAR volumes are reviewed by physicians in their clinic. The presence of a formal review process was also associated with significantly higher perceived thoroughness of review of OAR volumes compared to clinics with no formal review process (2 [2–3] vs 3 [2–4], P ?0.01). Conclusion Despite the critical role of OAR delineation and image registration in the 3DCRT and IMRT treatment planning process, physician review of these tasks is not always optimal. Radiotherapy clinics should consider implementation of formal processes to promote adequate physician review of OARs and image registrations to ensure the quality and safety of radiotherapy treatment plans.
机译:介绍图像登记和风险(OAR)的器官的注册和描绘是三维共形(3DCRT)和强度调制放疗(IMRT)治疗计划的关键组成部分。这项研究假设图像登记和OAR描绘通常由医学物理学家和/或剂量分子进行,并且不通过治疗医生常规审查。方法通过Medphys和Meddos ListServ组分发匿名,基于互联网的医学物理学家和剂量分子调查。有人要求参与者描述在他们的机构完成和审查OAR轮​​廓,目标卷轮廓和图像登记以及这些领域的个人培训以及执行这些任务的舒适程度的标准措施。李克特型尺度被报告为中位数[四分位数范围],分数从1?=?“非常/全部”到5?=?“不是所有/从未。”结果二百九十七人回应了调查。总体而言,受访者表明,医师审查经常较低(3 [2-4] vs 2 [1-3]),对医生审查的彻底度较低的信心(3 [2-4]和2 [1-3],P与图像配准相比,桨轮廓的<?0.01)。只有19%(95%CI 14-24%)的受访者报告了一个正式的过程,通过他们的诊所的医生审查了OAR卷。与没有正式审查过程的诊所(2 [2-3] Vs 3 [2-4],P <0.3],P <0.01)相比,正式审查过程的存在也与OAR体积的审查的彻底审查的彻底感知有关。结论尽管OAR描绘和图像登记在3DCRT和IMRT治疗计划过程中的关键作用,但医师对这些任务的审查并不总是最佳的。放射治疗诊所应考虑实施正式流程,以促进对OAR和图像注册的充足的医生审查,以确保放射治疗计划的质量和安全性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号