...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer >433?Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in combination with ipilimumab (IPI) versus IPI alone for advanced melanoma: 4-year interim analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
【24h】

433?Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in combination with ipilimumab (IPI) versus IPI alone for advanced melanoma: 4-year interim analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial

机译:433?Talimogene Laherparepvec(T-Vec)与Ipilimumab(IPI)的组合单独用于高级黑素瘤:4年的临时分析随机,开放标签,第2期试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background This is the first randomized trial evaluating an oncolytic virus with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in advanced melanoma. Improved objective response rate (ORR) was observed for T-VEC plus IPI compared to IPI alone (39% vs. 18%; OR 2.9; 95% Cl, 1.5–5.5; P=0.002). 1 At 3-year follow-up, median OS was not reached in either arm (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55–1.32; P=0.480). 2 Here we present 4-year interim analysis results including BRAF V600 mutation subgroup analysis. Methods Patients with unresectable or metastatic (IIIB-IV) melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive T-VEC plus IPI or IPI alone. T-VEC was injected day 1, week 1, at 106 PFU/mL, followed by 108 PFU/mL on day 1, week 4, and Q2W thereafter. IPI (3 mg/kg) was given Q3W starting day 1, week 6, up to 4 doses, for T-VEC arm; day 1, week 1 for IPI alone. Response was assessed per immune-related response criteria (irRC) Q12W until disease progression. The primary endpoint was ORR; key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), durable response rate (DRR), and safety ( NCT01740297 ). Results A total of 198 patients (98 combination, 100 IPI alone) were randomized. As of February 25, 2020, median follow-up was 48.3 months for combination and 35.7 months for IPI alone. DRR improved for combination vs. IPI (33.7% vs. 13.0%; OR 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7–7.0; P=0.001). Median PFS was 13.5 months with combination and 6.4 months with IPI (HR 0.81; 95% Cl, 0.57–1.15; P=0.23). Median OS was not reached for combination and was 50.1 months for IPI (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54–1.25; P=0.36). For combination, 47 (48.0%) patients received subsequent anti-cancer therapy vs. 64 (64.0%) for IPI; median time from randomization to first subsequent therapy was 27.7 months and 8.3 months, respectively. In subgroup analysis, patients without BRAF V600 mutation (63% combination, 60% IPI) improved DRR and PFS for combination vs. IPI alone (DRR: 33.9% vs. 5.0%; median PFS: 18.0 months vs. 4.5 months); BRAF V600 mutation positive patients (36% combination, 34% IPI) were similar between arms (DRR: 34.3% vs. 26.5%; median PFS: 4.2 months vs. 6.4 months). No additional safety signals observed in follow-up. Conclusions The improved PFS and DRR for the combination arm at 4-year follow-up indicates continued benefit of combination therapy. Patients receiving IPI alone were more likely to receive subsequent anti-cancer therapy in a shorter time. Subsequent anticancer therapies may confound OS analysis. The BRAF mutant post-hoc analysis requires further mechanistic investigation. Acknowledgements ? The authors thank the investigators, patients, and study staff who contributed to this study.? The study was sponsored and funded by Amgen Inc. ? Medical writing support was provided by Christopher Nosala (Amgen Inc.). Trial Registration NCT01740297 Ethics Approval The study was approved by all institutional ethics boards.
机译:背景技术这是第一个随机试验,评估具有晚期黑素瘤中的免疫检查点抑制剂的溶瘤病毒。与单独的IPI相比,观察到T-Vec Plus IPI的改善的客观反应速率(ORR)(39%对18%;或2.9; 95%Cl,1.5-5.5; p = 0.002)。 1在3年的随访中,在任一臂(HR,0.85; 95%CI,0.55-1.32; P = 0.480)中没有达到中位OS。 2在这里,我们展示了4年的中期分析结果,包括BRAF V600突变亚组分析。方法将不可切除或转移性(IIIB-IV)黑素瘤的患者随机1:1仅接收T-VEC加IPI或IPI。 T-VEC在106天,第1周,第1周,其后第1天,第4周,第4周,第4周和Q2W的108个PFU / mL。 IPI(3毫克/千克)被给予Q3W第1天,第6周,最多4剂,适用于T-Vec Arm;第1天,第1周仅为IPI。每种免疫相关响应标准评估响应(IrrC)Q12W,直至疾病进展。主要终点是ORR;关键次级终点是总体存活(OS),无进展生存(PFS),耐用的响应率(DRR)和安全(NCT01740297)。结果共有198名患者(98种组合,100个IPI)被随机化。截至2020年2月25日,单独为28.3个月的中位后续行动为35.7个月。 DRR改善组合与IPI组合(33.7%与13.0%;或3.4; 95%CI,1.7-7.0; P = 0.001)。中位数PFS为13.5个月,组合和6.4个月,具有IPI(HR 0.81; 95%CL,0.57-1.15; P = 0.23)。 IPI未达到中位操作系统,为50.1个月(HR 0.82; 95%CI,0.54-1.25; P = 0.36)。组合,47名(48.0%)患者接受随后的抗癌治疗与IPI的64名(64.0%);从随机化到第一次后续治疗的中位时间分别为27.7个月和8.3个月。在亚组分析中,没有BRAF V600突变的患者(63%组合,60%IPI)单独组合与IPI组合的DRR和PFS(DRR:33.9%与5.0%;中位数PFS:18.0个月与4.5个月); BRAF V600突变阳性患者(36%组合,34%IPI)在武器之间相似(DRR:34.3%与26.5%;中位数PFS:4.2个月与6.4个月)。在随访中没有观察到额外的安全信号。结论4年后续随访的组合臂改进的PFS和DRR表明联合治疗的持续受益。仅接受IPI的患者更容易在较短的时间内接受随后的抗癌治疗。随后的抗癌疗法可能会困扰OS分析。 BRAF突变体的HOC分析需要进一步的机制调查。致谢?作者感谢调查员,患者和研究这项研究的工作人员。?该研究由Amgen Inc.赞助和资助?由克里斯托弗NOSA(AMGEN Inc.)提供医疗书写支持。审判登记NCT01740297伦理批准该研究由所有制度伦理委员会批准。
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号