首页> 外文期刊>JMIR mHealth and uHealth >Attitudes Toward Using COVID-19 mHealth Tools Among Adults With Chronic Health Conditions: Secondary Data Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey
【24h】

Attitudes Toward Using COVID-19 mHealth Tools Among Adults With Chronic Health Conditions: Secondary Data Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey

机译:致力于使用Covid-19 MHEATH工具​​在具有慢性健康状况的成人中:Covid-19影响调查的二级数据分析

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Adults with chronic conditions are disproportionately burdened by COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. While COVID-19 mobile-health (mHealth) applications have emerged, research examining attitudes towards COVID-19 mHealth use among those with chronic conditions is scarce.OBJECTIVE:To examine attitudes and identify determinants of COVID-19 mHealth use across demographic and health-related characteristics; and evaluate associations of having chronic health conditions with attitudes towards COVID-19 mHealth use (e.g. use of mHealth or web-based methods to track COVID-19 exposures, symptoms, and recommendations).METHODS:We utilized nationally-representative data from the COVID-19 Impact Survey collected from April-June 2020 (n=10,760). Primary exposure was a history of chronic conditions which was defined using self-reported diagnoses of cardiometabolic, respiratory, immune-related, mental health conditions, and overweight/obesity. Primary outcomes were attitudes of COVID-19 mHealth including (1) likelihood of using a mobile-phone app to track COVID-19 symptoms and receive recommendations, (2) likelihood of using a website to track COVID-19 symptoms, location, and receive recommendations, and (3) likelihood of using an app using location to track potential COVID-19 exposure. COVID-19 mHealth use outcome response options were extremely/very likely, moderately likely, or not too likely/not likely at all. Multinomial logistic regression was used to compare likelihood of COVID-19 mHealth use across chronic health conditions, with not too likely/not likely at all as the reference category for each outcome. We evaluated determinants of each form of COVID-19 mHealth intervention using Poisson regression.RESULTS:Among the 10,760 respondents, about half were aged 30-59 years, female, had a household income $50,000, and had employer-sponsored insurance. Overall, 22% were extremely/very likely to use a mobile-phone app or a website to track their COVID-19 symptoms and receive recommendations. Almost one-quarter were extremely/very likely to use a mobile-phone app to track their location and receive push notifications if they have been exposed to COVID-19. After adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, and residence, adults living with mental health conditions were most likely to report being either extremely/very or moderately likely to use each mHealth intervention when compared to those who were not likely. Adults with respiratory-related chronic diseases were extremely/very (cOR:1.16, 95% CI:1.00-1.35) and moderately likely (cOR:1.23, 95% CI:1.04-1.45) to use a mobile-phone app to track their location and send push notifications if they might have been exposed to COVID-19. Across each mHealth intervention, positive determinants of extremely/very likely use included being female, racial/ethnic minority, and having at least one recent COVID-19 related symptom.CONCLUSIONS:Our study demonstrates that attitudes towards COVID-19 mHealth use vary widely by modality (web-based vs. app) and across chronic health conditions. These findings may inform adoption of and long-term engagement with COVID-19 apps, a crucial factor for determining their potential to reduce disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality among individuals with chronic health conditions.
机译:背景:具有慢性条件的成年人被Covid-19发病率和死亡率不成比例地负担。在Covid-19移动健康(MHECHEATH)应用程序中出现了,研究了对Covid-19 MHealth的态度在慢性条件下的态度是Scarce.objective:审查人口统计和健康的Covid-19 MHealth使用的态度和确定决定因素 - 相关特征;评估具有对Covid-19 MHEALTE使用的态度的慢性健康状况的协会(例如,使用MHECHEAT或基于网络的方法来跟踪Covid-19暴露,症状和建议)。方法:我们利用来自Covid的国家代表性数据-19从4月20日至6月20日收集的影响调查(n = 10,760)。主要暴露是使用自我报告的心细镜,呼吸,免疫相关,心理健康状况和超重/肥胖定义的慢性病症的历史。主要结果是Covid-19 MHEALT的态度,包括使用移动电话应用程序来跟踪Covid-19症状并获得建议,(2)使用网站跟踪Covid-19症状,位置和接收的可能性的可能性建议,(3)使用应用程序使用应用程序来跟踪潜在Covid-19曝光的可能性。 Covid-19 MHealth使用结果回应选项非常/非常可能,中等可能,或者不太可能/不太可能。多项式逻辑回归用于比较Covid-19 MHealth在慢性健康状况中使用的可能性,并不可能/不太可能作为每个结果的参考范畴。我们使用泊松回归评估了各种形式的Covid-19 MHealth干预的决定因素。结果:在10,760名受访者中,大约一半年龄在30-59岁,女性,家庭收入<50,000美元,并获得雇主赞助保险。总体而言,22%非常/非常可能使用移动电话应用程序或网站跟踪他们的Covid-19症状并获得建议。几乎单季度非常/很可能使用移动电话应用程序跟踪他们的位置并接收推送通知如果已接触到Covid-19。在调整年龄,种族/种族,性别,社会经济地位和居住时,与心理健康状况的成年人最有可能在与那些不太可能的人相比时报告非常/非常可能使用每个MHECHEATION的干预。具有呼吸相关的慢性疾病的成年人非常/非常(Cor:1.16,95%Ci:1.00-1.35)和中度可能(Cor:1.23,95%CI:1.04-1.45)使用移动电话应用程序跟踪他们的如果它们可能已暴露在Covid-19,则位置并发送推送通知。在每个MHECHEATH干预中,非常/非常可能使用的积极决定因素包括女性,种族/少数民族,至少有一个最近的Covid-19相关症状。结论:我们的研究表明,对Covid-19 MHEALTE的态度差异很大模态(基于Web的VS应用程序)和跨越长期健康状况。这些调查结果可以通过与Covid-19应用程序的通过和长期参与,这是确定其在慢性健康状况的个体中减少Covid-19发病率和死亡率的差异的关键因素。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号