首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan 80 mg Capsules: A Randomized, Single Dose, 4-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions
【24h】

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of Valsartan 80 mg Capsules: A Randomized, Single Dose, 4-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

机译:缬沙坦80 mg胶囊两种配方的药代动力学和生物等效性:在禁食和美联储条件下的健康中国志愿者中的随机,单剂量,4周期交叉研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the bioequivalence of two formulations of valsartan (80 mg capsules) under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers using a full-replicate study design. Methods: A total of 78 Subjects were randomly assigned to fasting cohort (n = 48) or fed cohort (n = 30). Each cohort includes 4 single-dose observation periods and 3-day washout periods. Blood samples were collected at designed time point. Plasma concentration of valsartan was analyzed by a validated LC-MS/MS method. Noncompartmental analysis method was employed to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters. Based on the within-subject standard deviation (S WR ) of the reference formulation, either reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) or average bioequivalence (ABE) method was used to evaluate the bioequivalence of the two formulations. Results: Under fasting conditions, the RSABE method was used to evaluate the bioequivalence of C max (S WR 0.294), while ABE method was used to evaluate the bioequivalence of AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ . The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the test/reference for C max was 99.52%, and the 95% upper confidence bound was 0. For AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ comparisons, GMRs were 102.07% and 101.92%, and the 90% CIs of the test/reference were 96.28%– 108.21%, 96.28%– 107.88%, respectively. Under fed conditions, the S WR value of C max , AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ all exceeded the cutoff value of 0.294 and therefore, the RSABE method was used. The GMRs for C max , AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ were 98.78%, 103.33% and 103.08%, respectively, while the 95% upper confidence bound values were all 0. These results all met the bioequivalence criteria for highly variable drugs. All adverse events were mild and transient. Conclusion: In this study, the generic formulation of valsartan 80 mg capsule was considered to be bioequivalent to the reference product under both fasting and fed conditions, and satisfied the requirements for marketing in China. NMPA Registration No: CTR20181422.
机译:目的:使用全重复研究设计比较健康中国志愿者的禁食和美联储条件下两种配方的生物等效性。方法:将总共78个受试者随机分配给禁食队列(n = 48)或喂食队列(n = 30)。每个队列包括4个单剂量观察时期和3天的洗涤期。在设计的时间点收集血样。通过验证的LC-MS / MS法分析缬沙坦的血浆浓度。使用非组分分析方法来确定药代动力学参数。基于参考制剂的受试者内标准偏差(S WR),使用基于参考标准的平均生物等效性(RS​​ABE)或平均生物等效(ABE)方法来评估两种制剂的生物等效性。结果:在禁食条件下,使用RSABE方法来评估C最大值(S WR> 0.294)的生物等效性,而被用于ABE方法来评估的AUC 0-t时的生物等效性和AUC 0-∞。用于C max的测试/参考的几何平均比率(GMR)为99.52%,95%的上置信度均为<0.对于AUC 0-T和AUC 0-∞比较,GMRS为102.07%和101.92%,和测试/参考的90%CIS分别为96.28% - 108.21%,96.28%-107.88%。根据美联储条件下,C MAX,AUC 0-T和AUC 0-∞的S WR值全部超过截止值0.294,因此使用了RSABE方法。 C MAX,AUC 0-T和AUC 0-∞的GMRS分别为98.78%,103.3%和103.08%,而95%的上置信度界定值均为<0。这些结果全部满足了高度变量的生物等效标准药物。所有不良事件都是轻度和瞬态的。结论:在这项研究中,缬沙坦80毫克胶囊的通用配方被认为是在禁食和美联储条件下对参考产品的生物等效,并满足了中国营销的要求。 NMPA注册号:CTR20181422。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号