...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
【24h】

Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study

机译:GNRH-A延长的议定书和短GNRH-A患者患者辅助繁殖繁殖的患者的比较:回顾性队列研究

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is widely used for pituitary down-regulation and recruiting more follicles in assisted reproduction. However, no information is available on its value for patients with thin endometrial thickness. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 302 patients with endometrium 8 mm undergoing fresh embryo transfer at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. In 148 cycles of the GnRH-a prolonged protocol, one depot of 3.75 mg GnRH-a was injected on day 2 of the menstrual cycle, while in 154 cycles of the short GnRH-a long protocol, 0.1 mg of GnRH-a was injected daily from the mid-luteal phase. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and characteristics of stimulation procedures. Results: Live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group than in the other group (36.5% vs 20.8%, P =0.002; 43.9% vs 28.2%, P =0.006, respectively). The live birth rate was significantly increased in the prolonged protocol group (crude OR: 2.190, 95% CI: 1.311, 3.660; adjusted OR: 2.458, 95% CI: 1.430, 4.224) compared with that in the reference group. The implantation rate of the former group was also significantly higher than that of the latter group (35.4% vs 15.9%, P =0.000). There was no significant difference in miscarriage rates between the two protocols. In terms of stimulation procedures, the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group required significantly higher Gn time (10.9 vs 9.5 days, P =0.000) and Gn consumption (2625.0 vs 2047.5 IU, P =0.000) than the short GnRH-a long protocol group. Conclusion: The GnRH-a prolonged protocol in fresh embryo transfer cycles yielded better clinical outcomes of patients with thin endometrium than the short GnRH-a long protocol.
机译:目的:促促术释放激素激动剂(GNRH-A)广泛用于垂体下调和招募更多卵泡的辅助繁殖。但是,没有任何信息对于薄子宫内膜厚度的患者提供了价值。患者及方法:这是2016年1月和2018年12月在大学医院的生育中心在大学医院生育中心的302名患有302名患有302名患者的回顾性队列研究。在148次GNRH-A延长的议定书中,一个仓库在月经周期的第2天注入3.75mg-a,而在154个循环的短GNRH-A长方案中,每天从中肺阶段注射0.1mg GnRH-A.在两组之间比较活率和临床妊娠率。其他结果措施包括植入率,流产率和刺激手术的特征。结果:GNRH-A延长的方案组活性出生率和临床妊娠率显着高于其他组(36.5%Vs 20.8%,P = 0.002; 43.9%,分别为28.2%,P = 0.006)。延长的方案组(粗原:2.190,95%CI:1.311,3.660;调整或:2.458,95%CI:1.430,4.224)在参考组中的延长率率显着增加。前组的植入率也明显高于后一组(35.4%Vs 15.9%,P = 0.000)。两方案之间的流产率没有显着差异。在刺激程序方面,GNRH-A延长的方案组需要明显更高的GN时间(10.9 Vs 9.5天,P = 0.000)和GN消耗(2625.0 Vs 2047.5 IU,P = 0.000),而不是短GNRH-A Long协议组。结论:新鲜胚胎转移循环中的GNRH-A延长的方案产生了比短GNRH-A长的患者患者更好的临床结果。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号