首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic pathology >Causes of misdiagnoses by thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): our experience and a systematic review
【24h】

Causes of misdiagnoses by thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): our experience and a systematic review

机译:甲状腺细针吸入细胞学(FNAC)误诊的原因:我们的经验和系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:FNA is a simple, safe, cost-effective and accurate diagnostic tool for the initial screening of patients with thyroid nodules. The aims of this study were to determine the diagnostic utility of FNAC performed in our institution, assess the cytomorphologic features that contribute to diagnostic errors and propose improvement measures.METHODS:A total of 2781 FNACs were included in the study, and 1122 cases were compared with their histological diagnoses. We retrospectively reexamined our discordant (both false-negative and false-positive) cases and performed a systematic review of previous studies on causes of misdiagnoses.RESULTS:When DC V and DC VI were both considered cytologic-positive, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy were 98.3, 30.9, 94.9, 58.3 and 93.5%, respectively. If DC VI was considered cytologic-positive, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC were 98.0, 84.0, 99.4, 58.3, and 97.5% respectively. The main cause of false-negative diagnoses was sampling error (13/15, 86.7%), while interpretation error led to the majority of the false-positive diagnoses (38/47, 80.9%). Overlapping cytological features in adenomatous hyperplasia, thyroiditis and cystic lesions were the major factors contributing to interpretation errors, while the size and number of nodules may have led to false-negative diagnoses because of heterogeneity and unsampled areas.CONCLUSIONS:The sensitivity and PPV of thyroid FNAC in our institution were higher than those in the published data, while the specificity and NPV were lower. Regarding the FNA category DC V, a frozen section analysis during diagnostic lobectomy is necessary. Multiple passes should be performed in various parts of a large nodule or from different nodules to reduce the risk of false-negative findings. Cytopathologists should strengthen their criteria for the identification of adenomatous hyperplasia, thyroiditis and cystic lesions to avoid false-positive diagnoses. NIFTP has little effect on diagnostic accuracy and the distribution of diagnostic errors.
机译:目的:FNA是一种简单,安全,成本效益,准确的诊断工具,用于初始筛选甲状腺结节患者。本研究的目的是确定FNAC在我们的机构中​​进行的诊断效用,评估有助于诊断误差的细胞形态特征,并提出改善措施。研究中,研究总共包括2781个FNAC,并比较1122例随着他们的组织学诊断。我们回顾性地重新审视了我们不安的(假阴性和假阳性)案例,并对以往的误诊原因进行了系统审查。结果:当DC V和DC VI都被认为是细胞学阳性,敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断准确度分别为98.3,30.9,94.9,58.3和93.5%。如果DC VI被认为是细胞学阳性,则FNAC的敏感性,特异性,PPV,NPV和诊断准确性分别为98.0,84.0,99.4,58.3和97.5%。假阴性诊断的主要原因是取样误差(13/15,86.7%),而解释误差导致大多数假阳性诊断(38/47,80.9%)。腺瘤性增生中的重叠细胞学特征是有助于解释误差的主要因素,而结节的大小和数量可能导致假阴性诊断,因为异质性和未夹杂的区域。结论:甲状腺的敏感性和PPV我们机构的FNAC高于公布数据中的FNAC,而特异性和NPV则较低。关于FNA类别DC V,需要在诊断术术期间进行冷冻截面分析。应在大结节的各个部分或来自不同结节的各个部分中进行多次通过,以降低假阴性结果的风险。细胞病变学家应加强鉴定腺瘤性增生,甲状腺炎和囊性病变以避免假阳性诊断的标准。 NIFTP对诊断准确性和诊断误差分布几乎没有影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号