首页> 外文期刊>Dermatology Online Journal >Rosacea videos on social media: A comparison of accuracy,quality, and viewer engagement
【24h】

Rosacea videos on social media: A comparison of accuracy,quality, and viewer engagement

机译:在社交媒体上的Rosacea视频:准确性,质量和观众参与的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Little is known regarding the accuracy,quality, and viewer engagement of video-basedonline education.Objective: To assess the accuracy, quality, viewerengagement, and viewer experience of rosaceavideos on social media.Methods: Reviewers searched “rosacea” andexamined videos on YouTube in September 2018.Videos were categorized by source: 1) Healthcaresources: university/professional organizations,industry, and individuals that were healthcareprofessionals, and 2) Non-healthcare sources: laymedia and individuals that were not healthcareprofessionals. Video accuracy was measured usingthe Dy et al. Accuracy Scale (DAS) and Accuracy inDigital-health Instrument (ANDI). Video quality wasmeasured using the Global Quality Scale (GQS).Viewer engagement was measured by theengagement ratio.Results:Of the videos analyzed, 71.7% of videos werefrom non-healthcare sources. Videos produced byhealthcare sources (28.3%) were significantly moreaccurate than those produced by non-healthcaresources, as measured by ANDI (3.57±0.83 versus2.54±1.07, P=0.001). Videos created by nonhealthcare sources received significantly greaterengagement than those by healthcare professionals(viewer engagement ratio 0.031±0.044 versus0.014±0.013, P=0.0159).Conclusion: Rosacea videos on social mediaproduced by non-healthcare sources were lessaccurate and of lower quality but received greaterviewer engagement than those produced byhealthcare sources.
机译:背景:关于视频直线教育的准确性,质量和观众参与的少量知名:评估RosaceAvideos在社交媒体上的准确性,质量,观看者和观众体验。方法:审稿人员搜索“Rosacea”和申请探索的视频YouTube 2018年9月。视频由来源归类:1)医疗资料:大学/专业组织,行业和作为医疗保健的个人和个人,以及2)非医疗保健来源:LAYMEDIA和不是医疗保健专家的个人。使用Dy等人测量视频精度。准确秤(DAS)和准确性疾病健康仪器(ANDI)。使用全球质量尺度(GQS)进行视频质量.Viewer参与是通过行动比率来衡量的。结果:分析的视频,71.7%的视频来自非医疗保健来源。通过ANDI(3.57±0.83 VERS2.54±1.07,P = 0.001,P = 0.001,P = 0.001),Videheathcare来源产生的视频(28.3%)显着不如由非医疗渠道生产的那些。非健康来源创建的视频比医疗保健专业人员的速度显着增加了(观众参与比0.031±0.044 VERSUS0.014±0.013,P = 0.0159)。结论:非医疗保健来源的社交媒体上的Rosacea视频令人难以理解,质量较低收到杰出者参与,而不是那些产生的evealthcare来源。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号