首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Who may heal? A plea from traditional healers to participate in treating Covid-19
【24h】

Who may heal? A plea from traditional healers to participate in treating Covid-19

机译:谁可以愈合?传统治疗师的辩护者参与处理Covid-19

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

During 2020, communities all over the world suffered from infections and disruptions because of the Covid-19 pandemic. Health assistance in different forms was provided to assist patients. In addition, the South African Department of Health employed several measures to curb the spread of the virus. The traditional healers acting as basic health providers objected to not being asked to participate in government activities dealing with the virus. Data acquired through a qualitative approach provided insight into the pleas of traditional healers to support in the fight against Covid-19. Traditional healers were not consulted by the Department of Health, although the traditional healers are officially considered as part of the government system to provide healthcare. The Traditional Health Practitioners Act , no. 22 of 2007, provided legal recognition to traditional healers. There has been extensive written work dealing with the role of Traditional Healers in the South African healthcare system. This article investigated, through a consideration of the available literature, the differences between the Healing and Biomedical paradigms as two separate ways of presenting healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic. Through a comparative study of the two approaches as represented by the paradigms, the reasons for not consulting and allowing traditional healers to participate in the fight against Covid-19 were investigated. Some of the reasons include the bias of science versus indigenous knowledge, as a basis for knowledge on health matters. The study recommended that traditional healers have a role to play and a contribution to make to the South African healthcare system and should be allowed to perform their activities. Contributions: The article contributes to the understanding of how different worldviews influence the application of medical services with a particular focus on treatment provided during the Covid-19 pandemic. The contribution to treatment by traditional healers is investigated. The relation between biomedical and traditional healing is highlighted with suggestions as to future collaboration.
机译:在2020年期间,由于Covid-19流行性,世界各地的社区遭受感染和中断。提供不同形式的健康援助来帮助患者。此外,南非卫生署采用了几项措施来遏制病毒的传播。作为基本健康提供者的传统治疗师反对没有被要求参加与病毒处理的政府活动。通过定性方法获得的数据提供了洞察传统治疗师,以支持对抗Covid-19。卫生部没有咨询传统治疗师,尽管传统的治疗师被正式被认为是政府制度提供医疗保健的一部分。传统的健康从业者行为,没有。 2007年第22册,为传统治疗师提供了法律承认。有广泛的书面工作,处理传统治疗师在南非医疗保健系统中的作用。本文通过审议可用文献调查,治愈和生物医学范式之间的差异作为在Covid-19大流行期间呈现医疗保健的两种单独方式。通过对划线所代表的两种方法的比较研究,调查了不咨询和允许传统治疗师参与与Covid-19的斗争的原因进行了调查。其中一些原因包括科学与土着知识的偏见,作为卫生事项知识的基础。该研究建议,传统的治疗师对南非医疗保健系统发挥作用和贡献,并应被允许履行其活动。贡献:本文有助于了解不同的世界观如何影响医疗服务的应用,特别关注Covid-19大流行期间提供的治疗。调查了传统治疗师对治疗的贡献。突出了生物医学与传统治疗的关系,提出了未来的合作。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号