首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions >Hydrologic benchmarking of meteorological drought indices at interannual to climate change timescales: a case study over the Amazon and Mississippi river basins
【24h】

Hydrologic benchmarking of meteorological drought indices at interannual to climate change timescales: a case study over the Amazon and Mississippi river basins

机译:气象干旱指数的水文学基准,持续跨国变化时间尺寸:以亚马逊和密西西比河流域为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Widely used metrics of drought are still derived solely from analyses of meteorological variables such as precipitation and temperature. While drought is generally a consequence of atmospheric anomalies, the impacts to society are more directly related to hydrologic conditions. The present study uses a standardized runoff index (SRI) as a proxy for river discharge and as a benchmark for various meteorological drought indices (scPDSI, SPI, SPEI_th, and SPEI_hg respectively). Only 12-month duration droughts are considered in order to allow a direct (no river routing) comparison between meteorological anomalies and their hydrological counterpart. The analysis is conducted over the Mississippi and Amazon river basins, which provide two contrasted test beds for evaluating drought indices at both interannual (using detrended data) and climate change (using raw data) timescales. Looking first at observations over the second half of the 20th century, the simple SPI based solely on precipitation is no less suitable than more sophisticated meteorological drought indices at detecting interannual SRI variations. Using the detrended runoff and meteorological outputs of a five-member single model ensemble of historical and 21th century climate simulations leads to the same conclusion. Looking at the 21st century projections, the response of the areal fraction in drought to global warming is shown to be strongly metric dependent and potentially overestimated by the drought indices which account for temperature variations. These results suggest that empirical meteorological drought indices should be considered with great caution in a warming climate and that more physical water balance models are needed to account for the impact of the anthropogenic radiative forcings on hydrological droughts.
机译:广泛使用的干旱指标仍然仅来自沉淀和温度等气象变量的分析。虽然干旱通常是大气异常的结果,但对社会的影响与水文条件更直接相关。本研究使用标准化的径流指数(SRI)作为河流放电的代理,作为各种气象干旱指数(SCPDSI,SPI,SPEI_TH和SPEI_HG)的基准。只考虑了12个月的持续时间干旱,以便在气象异常和水文对应之间的直接(无河道路线)比较。分析在密西西比和亚马逊河流盆地进行,它提供了两个对比的试验床,用于评估持续的旱营指数(使用削弱数据)和气候变化(使用原始数据)时间尺度。首先在20世纪下半叶观察到,简单的SPI完全基于降水的SPI在检测际SRI变化时比更复杂的气象干旱指数不那么合适。利用历史和21世纪的五个成员单一模型集合的延期径流和气象输出,气候模拟导致得出相同的结论。看着21世纪的预测,对全球变暖中的消耗级分的响应被认为是强烈的度量依赖性,并且可能被干旱指数估计,该指数占温度变化。这些结果表明,在温暖的气候中,应考虑经验气象干旱指标,并且需要更多的物理水平模型来解释人为辐射强调对水文干旱的影响。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号